• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A community-based study of reporting demographic and clinical information concordance between informants and cognitively impaired participants.一项基于社区的研究,报告了在认知障碍参与者中,报告者和认知正常的参与者之间人口统计学和临床信息的一致性。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jul;35(7):1571-1576. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02435-6. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
Subjective Cognitive Complaints: Comparing the Relation between Self-Reported Versus Informant-Reported Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Cognitive Performances in Cognitively Unimpaired, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Populations with Dementia.主观认知主诉:比较认知正常、轻度认知障碍和痴呆人群中自我报告和知情者报告的主观认知主诉与认知表现之间的关系。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(3):562-570. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2023.47.
3
Informant Reporting in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Sources of Discrepancy on the Functional Activities Questionnaire.轻度认知障碍中的信息报告:功能活动问卷的差异来源。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 May;26(5):503-514. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719001449. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Participant-Informant Relationships Affect Quality of Life Ratings in Incipient and Clinical Alzheimer Disease.参与者与提供信息者的关系影响早期和临床阿尔茨海默病患者的生活质量评分。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;25(3):297-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
5
Informants' Perception of Subjective Cognitive Decline Helps to Discriminate Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease from Normal Aging.信息提供者对主观认知衰退的认知有助于区分临床前阿尔茨海默病与正常衰老。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015 Sep 24;48 Suppl 1:S87-98. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150117.
6
Participant and study partner prediction and identification of cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: study partner vs. participant accuracy.临床前阿尔茨海默病认知障碍的参与者和研究伙伴预测和识别:研究伙伴与参与者的准确性。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Oct 18;11(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0539-3.
7
Item-Level Investigation of Participant and Study Partner Report on the Cognitive Function Index from the A4 Study Screening Data.项目层面调查参与者和研究伙伴对 A4 研究筛查数据中认知功能指数的报告。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(3):257-262. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.8.
8
Influence of affective states on informant impression of neuropsychiatric symptoms in people living with MCI.情感状态对认知障碍患者神经精神症状知情者印象的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Nov-Dec;27(11):2128-2133. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2191928. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
9
Self- and Informant-Reported Memory Complaints: Frequency and Severity in Cognitively Intact Individuals and those with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Neurodegenerative Dementias.自我报告和知情者报告的记忆主诉:认知正常个体以及轻度认知障碍和神经退行性痴呆个体中的频率和严重程度。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(3):1011-1027. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180083.
10
Self-Reported Personality Traits and Informant-Rated Cognition: A 10-Year Prospective Study.自我报告的人格特质与知情者评定的认知:一项为期 10 年的前瞻性研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;72(1):181-190. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190555.

本文引用的文献

1
Lack of Any Caregiving for Those with Dementia.缺乏对痴呆症患者的任何护理。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(2):531-535. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215418.
2
T-MoCA: A valid phone screen for cognitive impairment in diverse community samples.T-MoCA:一种适用于不同社区样本认知障碍的有效电话筛查工具。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021 Feb 5;13(1):e12144. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12144. eCollection 2021.
3
How Accurately Do Patients and Their Care Partners Report Results of Amyloid-β PET Scans for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment?患者及其护理伙伴对阿尔茨海默病评估的淀粉样蛋白-β PET 扫描结果报告的准确性如何?
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;74(2):625-636. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190922.
4
Methods and Early Recruitment of a Community-Based Study of Cognitive Impairment Among Mexican Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites: The BASIC-Cognitive Study.方法和早期招募:一项基于社区的墨西哥裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人认知障碍研究:BASIC-Cognitive 研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(1):185-196. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190761.
5
Proxy interviews and bias in the distribution of cognitive abilities due to non-response in longitudinal studies: a comparison of HRS and ELSA.代理访谈以及纵向研究中因无应答导致的认知能力分布偏差:健康与退休研究(HRS)和英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的比较
Longit Life Course Stud. 2011 May;2(2):170-184. doi: 10.14301/llcs.v2i2.116.
6
Patient-caregiver concordance in symptom assessment and improvement in outcomes for patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy.癌症化疗患者症状评估中患者与护理者的一致性及患者预后改善情况
Chronic Illn. 2010 Mar;6(1):46-56. doi: 10.1177/1742395309359208.
7
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA):一种用于轻度认知障碍的简易筛查工具。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
8
Aging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval.衰老与自传体记忆:区分情景记忆与语义记忆检索
Psychol Aging. 2002 Dec;17(4):677-89.

一项基于社区的研究,报告了在认知障碍参与者中,报告者和认知正常的参与者之间人口统计学和临床信息的一致性。

A community-based study of reporting demographic and clinical information concordance between informants and cognitively impaired participants.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, CVC 3194, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5855, USA.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jul;35(7):1571-1576. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02435-6. Epub 2023 May 19.

DOI:10.1007/s40520-023-02435-6
PMID:37204754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10330588/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding concordance between informants' and cognitively impaired participants' information reporting is crucial for Alzheimer's and Alzheimer's-related dementia studies.

METHODS

The Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi-Cognitive is a community-based cohort study. Households in Nueces County, Texas, USA, were randomly identified. 330 dyads of participants and their named informants answered questions. Models were generated to examine which predictors, including age, gender, ethnicity, cognitive function, and relationship to informant, influenced answer discordance.

RESULTS

For demographic items, female participants and participants with spouses/partners as informants had significantly less discordance, with incidence rate rations (IRRs) of 0.65 (CI = 0.44, 0.96) and 0.41 (CI = 0.23, 0.75), respectively. For health items, better cognitive function of the participant was associated with less discordance, with an IRR of 0.85 (CI = 0.76, 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic information concordance is most associated with gender and informant-participant relationship. Level of cognitive function is most associated with concordance for health information.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier NCT03403257.

摘要

背景

了解信息报告者和认知障碍参与者之间的一致性对于阿尔茨海默病和阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆症的研究至关重要。

方法

脑卒中超群监测-Cognition(Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi-Cognition, BASIC)是一项基于社区的队列研究。美国得克萨斯州努埃塞斯县的家庭被随机确定。330 对参与者及其指定的信息报告者回答了问题。生成模型以检查哪些预测因素(包括年龄、性别、种族、认知功能和与信息报告者的关系)会影响答案的不一致性。

结果

在人口统计学项目中,女性参与者和配偶/伴侣作为信息报告者的参与者的不一致性明显较低,发生率比(IRR)分别为 0.65(CI=0.44,0.96)和 0.41(CI=0.23,0.75)。在健康项目中,参与者的认知功能越好,不一致性越低,IRR 为 0.85(CI=0.76,0.94)。

结论

人口统计学信息的一致性最受性别和信息报告者与参与者关系的影响。认知功能水平与健康信息的一致性最相关。

临床试验

gov 标识符 NCT03403257。