Suppr超能文献

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的影像学结果回顾性评估与分析:北爱尔兰的经验

A Retrospective Evaluation and Review of Radiographic Outcomes for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Procedures: Northern Ireland's Experience.

作者信息

McKee Christopher, Espey Robert, O'Halloran Amanda, Curran Adrian, Darwish Nagy

机构信息

Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, GBR.

Orthopaedic Surgery, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 May 11;15(5):e38864. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38864. eCollection 2023 May.

Abstract

Introduction Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cervical spondylosis refractory to analgesic medical management. Currently, there are numerous approaches and devices used; however, there is no single implant that is preferred for this procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiological outcomes of ACDF procedures performed in the regional spinal surgery centre in Northern Ireland. The results of this study will aid surgical decision-making, specifically with regard to the choice of implant. The implants that will be assessed in this study are the stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage (Cage) and the Zero-profile augmented screw implant (Z-P). Methods A total of 420 ACDF cases were reviewed retrospectively. Following exclusion and inclusion criteria, 233 cases were reviewed. In the Z-P group, there were 117 patients, with 116 in the Cage group. Radiographic assessment was carried out at the pre-operative stage, day one post-operation, and follow-up (> three months). Measured parameters included segmental disc height, segmental Cobb angle, and spondylolisthesis displacement distance. Results Patient characteristic features showed no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05) and no significant difference in mean follow-up time (p=0.146). The Z-P implant was superior in increasing and maintaining disc height post-operatively (+0.4±0.94mm, 5.20±0.66mm) compared to the Cage (+0.1±1.00mm, 4.40±0.95mm) (p<0.001). Z-P was also more successful in restoring and maintaining cervical lordosis in comparison to the Cage group, as it had a significantly smaller kyphosis incidence (0.85% vs. 34.5%) at follow-up (p<0.001). Conclusions Results of this study show a more advantageous outcome in the Zero-profile group as it restores and maintains both disc height and cervical lordosis; it is also more successful in treating spondylolisthesis. This study advocates cautious endorsement of the use of the Zero-profile implant in ACDF procedures for symptomatic cervical disc disease.

摘要

引言

前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是药物镇痛治疗无效的症状性颈椎病的金标准治疗方法。目前,该手术有多种手术方式和植入器械;然而,对于此手术并没有一种特别推荐的单一植入物。本研究的目的是评估在北爱尔兰地区脊柱外科中心进行的ACDF手术的影像学结果。本研究结果将有助于手术决策,特别是在植入物的选择方面。本研究中评估的植入物是独立聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器(椎间融合器)和零切迹增强螺钉植入物(Z-P)。

方法

回顾性分析了420例ACDF病例。根据排除和纳入标准,最终纳入233例病例进行分析。其中Z-P组117例患者,椎间融合器组116例患者。在术前、术后第1天和随访(>3个月)时进行影像学评估。测量参数包括节段性椎间盘高度、节段性Cobb角和椎体滑脱移位距离。

结果

患者特征在两组之间无显著差异(p>0.05),平均随访时间也无显著差异(p=0.146)。与椎间融合器相比,Z-P植入物在术后增加和维持椎间盘高度方面更具优势(分别为+0.4±0.94mm,5.20±0.66mm),而椎间融合器组为(+0.1±1.00mm,4.40±0.95mm)(p<0.001)。与椎间融合器组相比,Z-P在恢复和维持颈椎前凸方面也更成功,因为在随访时其后凸发生率显著更低(0.85%对34.5%)(p<0.001)。

结论

本研究结果显示,零切迹组在恢复和维持椎间盘高度及颈椎前凸方面有更有利的结果;在治疗椎体滑脱方面也更成功。本研究主张在有症状的颈椎间盘疾病的ACDF手术中谨慎认可使用零切迹植入物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a1/10188236/55fc4f96e8e0/cureus-0015-00000038864-i01.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1

本文引用的文献

3
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Zero-P System for Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Meta-Analysis.
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Dec 16;2021:3960553. doi: 10.1155/2021/3960553. eCollection 2021.
4
Use of zero-profile device for contiguous three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison with cage and plate construct.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jun 4;35(2):219-226. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201319. Print 2021 Aug 1.
6
Two-level ACDF with a zero-profile stand-alone spacer compared to conventional plating: a prospective randomized single-center study.
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2814-2822. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06454-z. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
A Review of Complication Rates for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion (ACDF).
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Jun 7;10:100. doi: 10.25259/SNI-191-2019. eCollection 2019.
9
Radiological Fusion Criteria of Postoperative Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.
Global Spine J. 2018 Oct;8(7):739-750. doi: 10.1177/2192568218755141. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
10
Zero-Profile Versus Cage and Plate in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with a Minimum 2 Years of Follow-Up: A Meta-Analysis.
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e551-e561. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.128. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验