Mekhael Elio, El Rachkidi Rami, Saliby Renee Maria, Nassim Nabil, Semaan Karl, Massaad Abir, Karam Mohamad, Saade Maria, Ayoub Elma, Rteil Ali, Jaber Elena, Chaaya Celine, Abi Nahed Julien, Ghanem Ismat, Assi Ayman
Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Technology Innovation Unit, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Front Surg. 2023 May 3;10:1166734. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1166734. eCollection 2023.
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is classically evaluated by health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires and static radiographic spino-pelvic and global alignment parameters. Recently, 3D movement analysis (3DMA) was used for functional assessment of ASD to objectively quantify patient's independence during daily life activities. The aim of this study was to determine the role of both static and functional assessments in the prediction of HRQoL outcomes using machine learning methods.
ASD patients and controls underwent full-body biplanar low-dose x-rays with 3D reconstruction of skeletal segment as well as 3DMA of gait and filled HRQoL questionnaires: SF-36 physical and mental components (PCS&MCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. A random forest machine learning (ML) model was used to predict HRQoL outcomes based on three simulations: (1) radiographic, (2) kinematic, (3) both radiographic and kinematic parameters. Accuracy of prediction and RMSE of the model were evaluated using 10-fold cross validation in each simulation and compared between simulations. The model was also used to investigate the possibility of predicting HRQoL outcomes in ASD after treatment.
In total, 173 primary ASD and 57 controls were enrolled; 30 ASD were followed-up after surgical or medical treatment. The first ML simulation had a median accuracy of 83.4%. The second simulation had a median accuracy of 84.7%. The third simulation had a median accuracy of 87%. Simulations 2 and 3 had comparable accuracies of prediction for all HRQoL outcomes and higher predictions compared to Simulation 1 (i.e., accuracy for PCS = 85 ± 5 vs. 88.4 ± 4 and 89.7% ± 4%, for MCS = 83.7 ± 8.3 vs. 86.3 ± 5.6 and 87.7% ± 6.8% for simulations 1, 2 and 3 resp., < 0.05). Similar results were reported when the 3 simulations were tested on ASD after treatment.
This study showed that kinematic parameters can better predict HRQoL outcomes than stand-alone classical radiographic parameters, not only for physical but also for mental scores. Moreover, 3DMA was shown to be a good predictive of HRQoL outcomes for ASD follow-up after medical or surgical treatment. Thus, the assessment of ASD patients should no longer rely on radiographs alone but on movement analysis as well.
成人脊柱畸形(ASD)传统上通过与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)问卷以及静态放射学脊柱骨盆和整体对线参数进行评估。最近,三维运动分析(3DMA)被用于ASD的功能评估,以客观量化患者在日常生活活动中的独立性。本研究的目的是使用机器学习方法确定静态和功能评估在预测HRQoL结果中的作用。
ASD患者和对照组接受了全身双平面低剂量X射线检查,进行骨骼节段的三维重建以及步态的3DMA,并填写了HRQoL问卷:SF-36身体和心理成分(PCS&MCS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)以及疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)。使用随机森林机器学习(ML)模型基于三种模拟来预测HRQoL结果:(1)放射学参数,(2)运动学参数,(3)放射学和运动学参数。在每次模拟中使用10折交叉验证评估模型的预测准确性和均方根误差(RMSE),并在模拟之间进行比较。该模型还用于研究预测ASD治疗后HRQoL结果的可能性。
总共纳入了173例原发性ASD患者和57例对照组;30例ASD患者在接受手术或药物治疗后进行了随访。第一次ML模拟的中位准确率为83.4%。第二次模拟的中位准确率为84.7%。第三次模拟的中位准确率为87%。模拟2和模拟3对所有HRQoL结果的预测准确率相当,且与模拟1相比预测更高(即,对于PCS,模拟1、2和3的准确率分别为85±5%、88.4±4%和89.7%±4%;对于MCS,分别为83.7±8.3%、86.3±5.6%和87.7%±6.8%,P<0.05)。当对治疗后的ASD进行这三种模拟测试时,也得到了类似的结果。
本研究表明,运动学参数比单独的传统放射学参数能更好地预测HRQoL结果,不仅对于身体评分,对于心理评分也是如此。此外,3DMA被证明是ASD在接受药物或手术治疗后进行随访时HRQoL结果的良好预测指标。因此,对ASD患者的评估不应再仅依赖于X线片,还应包括运动分析。