• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪和青少年诊断对假释释放决策的影响:一种实验方法。

The effects of emotion and juvenile diagnoses on parole release decisions: An experimental approach.

机构信息

College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas; Prairie View A&M University College of Arts and Sciences, Prairie View, TX, USA.

College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas; Prairie View A&M University College of Arts and Sciences, Prairie View, TX, USA.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 May-Jun;88:101893. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101893. Epub 2023 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101893
PMID:37207399
Abstract

Parole boards are often required to make many release recommendations after reviewing a substantial amount of information in a short timeframe. While making release decisions, parole board members might be motivated to sacrifice accuracy and, instead, use heuristics, such as their emotions. Emotions might increase the reliance on risk or threat related information, such as an inmate's mental illness status. The current study applies the appraisal tendency framework of emotion to assess the impact of emotion on parole decisions involving juvenile mental health diagnoses. Using a 3(emotion: anger, compassion, and control) x 4(mental illness: conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, depression, and control) factorial design, this study examined the extent to which mock parole board members' emotions impacted evaluations of inmates with juvenile mental illness diagnoses and subsequent release decisions. Results indicated that there was no effect of emotion on parole decisions. However, the inmates' mental illnesses did play a role in parole release decisions. Specifically, parole candidates with depression were released on parole at higher rates compared to conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and the control condition. Policy implications are discussed.

摘要

假释委员会在审查大量信息后通常需要提出许多释放建议。在做出释放决定时,假释委员会成员可能会出于牺牲准确性的动机,而使用启发式方法,例如情绪。情绪可能会增加对风险或威胁相关信息的依赖,例如囚犯的精神疾病状况。本研究应用情绪的评价倾向框架来评估情绪对涉及青少年心理健康诊断的假释决策的影响。本研究采用 3(情绪:愤怒、同情和控制)x 4(精神疾病:品行障碍、对立违抗性障碍、抑郁和对照)的因子设计,考察了模拟假释委员会成员的情绪对评估患有青少年精神疾病诊断的囚犯以及随后的释放决策的影响程度。结果表明,情绪对假释决策没有影响。然而,囚犯的精神疾病确实在假释释放决策中发挥了作用。具体而言,患有抑郁症的假释候选人被假释的比例高于品行障碍、对立违抗性障碍和对照条件。讨论了政策影响。

相似文献

1
The effects of emotion and juvenile diagnoses on parole release decisions: An experimental approach.情绪和青少年诊断对假释释放决策的影响:一种实验方法。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 May-Jun;88:101893. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101893. Epub 2023 May 18.
2
Release or Denial: Evaluating the Roles of Emotion and Risk in Parole Decisions.释囚或拒囚:评估情绪和风险在假释决策中的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Aug;125(4):2088-2108. doi: 10.1177/00332941211007929. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
3
Mental illness, criminal risk factors and parole release decisions.精神疾病、犯罪风险因素与假释释放决策。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):528-53. doi: 10.1002/bsl.991. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
4
Mental Health Risk Factors and Parole Decisions: Does Inmate Mental Health Status Affect Who Gets Released.心理健康风险因素与假释决策:囚犯的心理健康状况是否影响释放人员。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 16;16(16):2950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162950.
5
How do parole board members in England and Wales construct decisions about whether to release perpetrators of intimate partner violence from prison?英格兰和威尔士的假释委员会成员如何做出关于是否将亲密伴侣暴力的施害者从监狱中释放的决定?
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2020 Dec;30(6):350-362. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2183. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
6
Waiving away the chance of freedom: exploring why prisoners decide against applying for parole.放弃自由的机会:探究囚犯决定不申请假释的原因。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2014 Mar;58(3):320-47. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12470812. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
7
Actor-observer asymmetry in perceptions of parole board release decisions.假释委员会释放决定认知中的行为者-观察者不对称性。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Dec 7;28(5):623-644. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1821826. eCollection 2021.
8
Influence of the HCR-20, LS/CMI, and PCL-R on decisions about parole suitability among lifers.《高危罪犯-20评估表》(HCR-20)、《生活史及犯罪多分类量表》(LS/CMI)和《心理变态核查表-修订版》(PCL-R)对终身监禁犯假释适宜性决策的影响
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Jun;39(3):232-43. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000111. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
9
Revisiting Parole Decision Making: Testing for the Punitive Hypothesis in a Large U.S. Jurisdiction.重新审视假释决策:在美国一个大司法管辖区对惩罚性假设进行检验。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Apr;62(5):1357-1383. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16668512. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
Parole release decisions: impact of positive and negative victim and nonvictim input on a representative sample of parole-eligible inmates.
Violence Vict. 2010;25(2):224-42. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.224.