Division of Shoulder Surgery, the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
The University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
J ISAKOS. 2023 Oct;8(5):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 18.
Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in its modern form where it reproduces the normal shoulder has been utilized clinically for more than half a century. As the technology and the designs have changed to recreate the humeral and glenoid sides of the joint, the sophistication of design has resulted in the growing number of cases annually worldwide. This increase is due in part to the increasing number of indications that the prosthesis can treat with successful results. On the humeral side, there have been design changes to better reflect the proximal humeral anatomy, and humeral stems are increasingly placed safely without cement. Platform systems which allow conversion of a failed arthroplasty to a reverse configuration without stem extraction is another design change. Similarly, there has been increasing utilization of short stem and stemless humeral components. Extensive experience with shorter stem and stemless devices, however, has yet to demonstrate the purported advantages of these devices, as recent studies have demonstrated equivalent blood loss, fracture rates, operative times, and outcome scores. Easier revision with these shorter stems remains to be definitively established, with only one study comparing the ease of revision between stem types. On the glenoid side, hybrid cementless glenoids, inlay glenoids, cementless all-polyethylene glenoids, and augmented glenoids have all been investigated; however, the indications for these devices remain unclear. Lastly, innovative surgical approaches to implanting shoulder arthroplasty and the use of patient specific guides and computerized planning, while interesting concepts, still await validation before they are utilized on a widespread basis. While reverse shoulder arthroplasty has been increasingly used to reconstruct the arthritic shoulder, anatomic glenohumeral replacement maintains a significant role in the armamentarium of the shoulder surgeon.
解剖型全肩关节置换术在其现代形式中,能够复制正常的肩关节,已经在临床上应用了半个多世纪。随着技术和设计的改变,以重新创建关节的肱骨和肩胛盂侧,设计的复杂性导致了全球每年的病例数量不断增加。这种增加部分归因于假体可以成功治疗的适应证数量的增加。在肱骨侧,已经进行了设计更改,以更好地反映肱骨近端解剖结构,并且越来越安全地放置无水泥的肱骨柄。允许在不提取柄的情况下将失败的关节置换转换为反向构型的平台系统是另一个设计更改。同样,越来越多地使用短柄和无柄肱骨组件。然而,广泛使用短柄和无柄装置的经验尚未证明这些装置的预期优势,因为最近的研究表明,这些装置的失血量、骨折率、手术时间和结果评分相当。这些较短的柄更容易进行翻修仍有待明确证实,只有一项研究比较了不同类型的柄之间的翻修难易程度。在肩胛盂侧,混合非骨水泥肩胛盂、镶嵌肩胛盂、非骨水泥全聚乙烯肩胛盂和增强肩胛盂都进行了研究;然而,这些装置的适应证仍不明确。最后,创新的肩关节置换植入手术方法和使用患者特异性导板和计算机化规划,虽然是有趣的概念,但在广泛应用之前仍需要验证。虽然反向肩关节置换术已越来越多地用于重建关节炎性肩关节,但解剖型全肩关节置换术在肩关节外科医生的工具中仍占有重要地位。