Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间异基因造血细胞产品的冷冻保存:移植物特征及植入结果

Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Products During COVID-19 Pandemic: Graft Characterization and Engraftment Outcomes.

作者信息

Keyzner Alla, Azzi Jacques, Jakubowski Rita, Sinitsyn Yelena, Tindle Sharon, Shpontak Svitlana, Kwon Deukwoo, Isola Luis, Iancu-Rubin Camelia

机构信息

Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2023 Oct;55(8):1799-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.03.070. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered the deployment of unfamiliar measures to safeguard successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Among these measures, cryopreservation offered logistical benefits that could outlast the pandemic, including graft availability and timely clinical service. The purpose of this study was to evaluate graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution in patients transplanted with cryopreserved allogeneic stem cell products during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We evaluated 44 patients who underwent allo-HCT using cryopreserved grafts consisting of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) apheresis (A) and bone marrow (BM) products at Mount Sinai Hospital. Comparative analyses of 37 grafts infused fresh during the one-year period preceding the pandemic were performed. Assessment of cellular therapy products included total nucleated cell and CD34+ cell enumeration, viability, and post-thaw recovery. The primary clinical endpoint was the evaluation of engraftment (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] and platelet count) and donor chimerism (presence of CD33+ and CD3+ donor cells) at day +30 and +100 post-transplant. Adverse events related to cell infusion were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable between the fresh and cryopreserved groups with 2 exceptions in the HPC-A cohort: the number of patients in the cryopreserved group that received haploidentical grafts was 6 times that in the fresh group, and the number of patients in the fresh group with a Karnofsky performance score >90 was double that in the cryopreserved group. The quality of HPC-A and HPC-BM products was not affected by cryopreservation, and all grafts met the release criteria for infusion. The pandemic did not affect the time between collection and cryopreservation (median, 24 hours) and time in storage (median, 15 days). Median time to ANC recovery was significantly delayed in recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A (15 vs 11 days, P = .0121), and there was a trend toward delayed platelet engraftment (24 vs 19 days, P = .0712). The delay in ANC and platelet recovery was not observed when only matched graft recipients were compared. Cryopreservation did not affect the ability of HPC-BM grafts to engraft and reconstitute hematopoiesis, and there was no difference in the rates of ANC and platelet recovery. Achievement of donor CD3/CD33 chimerism was not affected by cryopreservation of either HPC-A or HPC-BM products. Graft failure was observed in only 1 case, a recipient of cryopreserved HPC-BM. Three recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A grafts died before ANC engraftment from infectious complications. Remarkably, 22% of our studied population had myelofibrosis, and almost half received cryopreserved HPC-A grafts with no graft failure observed. Finally, patients receiving cryopreserved grafts were at a higher risk of infusion-related adverse events than those receiving fresh grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryopreservation of allogeneic grafts results in adequate product quality with minimal impact on short-term clinical outcomes, except for an increased risk of infusion-related adverse events. Cryopreservation is a safe option in terms of graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution with logistical benefits, but additional data are needed to determine long-term outcomes and assess whether this is a suitable strategy for at-risk patients.

摘要

背景

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行促使人们采取了一些不熟悉的措施来保障异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)的成功进行。在这些措施中,冷冻保存带来的后勤保障优势可能会在大流行结束后持续存在,包括移植物的可用性和及时的临床服务。本研究的目的是评估在COVID-19大流行期间接受冷冻保存的异基因干细胞产品移植的患者的移植物质量和造血重建情况。

方法

我们评估了44例在西奈山医院接受allo-HCT的患者,这些患者使用了由造血祖细胞(HPC)单采(A)和骨髓(BM)产品组成的冷冻保存移植物。对大流行前一年期间输注的37例新鲜移植物进行了对比分析。对细胞治疗产品的评估包括有核细胞总数和CD34+细胞计数、活力及解冻后回收率。主要临床终点是评估移植后第30天和第100天的植入情况(绝对中性粒细胞计数[ANC]和血小板计数)以及供体嵌合情况(CD33+和CD3+供体细胞的存在情况)。还分析了与细胞输注相关的不良事件。

结果

新鲜组和冷冻保存组的患者特征具有可比性,但HPC-A队列中有2个例外:冷冻保存组中接受单倍体相合移植物的患者数量是新鲜组的6倍,新鲜组中卡诺夫斯基表现评分>90的患者数量是冷冻保存组的两倍。HPC-A和HPC-BM产品的质量不受冷冻保存的影响,所有移植物均符合输注放行标准。大流行未影响采集与冷冻保存之间的时间(中位数为24小时)和储存时间(中位数为15天)。接受冷冻保存的HPC-A的受者ANC恢复的中位时间显著延迟(15天对11天,P = 0.0121),血小板植入有延迟趋势(24天对19天,P = 0.0712)。仅比较匹配移植物受者时未观察到ANC和血小板恢复延迟。冷冻保存不影响HPC-BM移植物的植入和造血重建能力,ANC和血小板恢复率无差异。HPC-A或HPC-BM产品的冷冻保存均不影响供体CD3/CD33嵌合的实现。仅1例冷冻保存的HPC-BM受者出现移植物失败。3例接受冷冻保存的HPC-A移植物的受者在ANC植入前因感染并发症死亡。值得注意的是,我们研究的人群中有22%患有骨髓纤维化,近一半接受了冷冻保存的HPC-A移植物,未观察到移植物失败。最后,接受冷冻保存移植物的患者发生输注相关不良事件的风险高于接受新鲜移植物的患者。

结论

异基因移植物的冷冻保存可使产品质量合格,对短期临床结局影响最小,但输注相关不良事件的风险增加。就移植物质量和造血重建而言,冷冻保存是一种具有后勤保障优势的安全选择,但需要更多数据来确定长期结局,并评估这是否是高危患者的合适策略。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验