Suppr超能文献

使用冷冻保存的CD34选择移植物进行异基因造血细胞移植后的普遍植入

Universal Engraftment after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Cryopreserved CD34-Selected Grafts.

作者信息

Jacob Reuben P, Flynn Jessica, Devlin Sean M, Maloy Molly, Giralt Sergio A, Maslak Peter, O'Reilly Richard J, Tonon Jo-Ann, Perales Miguel Angel, Avecilla Scott T, Cho Christina

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Aug;27(8):697.e1-697.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 May 13.

Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, most centers performing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have switched to the use of cryopreserved grafts. Previous investigators have suggested that cryopreserved allografts may heighten risk of nonengraftment. To date, no study has investigated the effect of cryopreservation of CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34 HPCs) used as the sole graft source. In this study, we sought to evaluate outcomes after unrelated donor or matched sibling allo-HCT with cryopreserved CD34 HPCs. This was a single-center analysis of adult patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent allo-HCT with cryopreserved CD34-selected allo-HCT grafts between January 2010 and June 2017. All patients received ablative conditioning and antirejection prophylaxis with rabbit antithymocyte globulin. G-CSF-mobilized leukapheresis products underwent CD34 selection using the CliniMACS Reagent System. Cells were then cryopreserved in DMSO (final concentration 7.5%) to -90 °C using a controlled-rate freezing system before being transferred to vapor-phase liquid nitrogen storage. In internal validation, this method has shown 92% mean CD34 cell viability and 99.7% mean CD34 cell recovery. Engraftment was defined as the first of 3 consecutive days of an absolute neutrophil count of ≥0.5. Platelet recovery was recorded as the first of 7 consecutive days with a platelet count ≥20 K/μL without transfusion. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), and cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate rates of relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A total of 64 patients received a cryopreserved CD34-selected graft. The median CD34 cell count before cryopreservation was 6.6 × 10/kg (range, 1.4 to 16.1 × 10/kg), and the median CD3 cell count was 2.0 × 10/kg (range, 0 to 21.1 × 10/kg). All patients were engrafted, at a median of 11 days post-HCT (range, 8 to 14 days). One patient had poor graft function in the setting of cytomegalovirus viremia, necessitating a CD34-selected boost on day +57. The median time to platelet recovery was 16 days (range, 13 to 99 days). The estimated 2-year OS was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58% to 83%) with cryopreserved grafts versus 62% (95% CI, 57% to 67%) with fresh grafts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.35; P = .5). The estimated 2-year RFS in the 2 groups was 59% (95% CI, 48% to 74%) versus 56% (95% CI, 51% to 61%; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.51; P > .9). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 29% (95% CI, 17% to 41%) versus 23% (95% CI, 19% to 27%; P = .16), and the cumulative incidence of NRM at 2 years was 17% (95% CI, 9% to 28%) versus 23% (95% CI, 19% to 28%; P = .24). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100 was 16% with cryopreserved grafts (95% CI, 8% to 26%) and 16% (95% CI, 13% to 20%; P = .97) with fresh grafts. Moderate to severe chronic GVHD by day +365 occurred in only 1 recipient of a cryopreserved graft (2%). Our data show that in patients with hematologic malignancies who received cryopreserved allogeneic CD34 HPCs, engraftment, GVHD, and survival outcomes were consistent with those seen in recipients of fresh allogeneic CD34 HPC grafts at our center. Our laboratory validation and clinical experience demonstrate the safety of our cryopreservation procedure for CD34-selected allografts.

摘要

由于新冠疫情,大多数开展异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)的中心已改用冷冻保存的移植物。此前有研究人员认为,冷冻保存的同种异体移植物可能会增加植入失败的风险。迄今为止,尚无研究调查过将经CD34选择的造血祖细胞(CD34 HPCs)作为唯一移植物来源进行冷冻保存的影响。在本研究中,我们试图评估使用冷冻保存的CD34 HPCs进行无关供体或匹配同胞allo-HCT后的结果。这是一项针对血液系统恶性肿瘤成年患者的单中心分析,这些患者在2010年1月至2017年6月期间接受了经CD34选择的冷冻保存allo-HCT移植物的移植。所有患者均接受了清髓预处理,并使用兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白进行抗排斥预防。使用CliniMACS试剂系统对粒细胞集落刺激因子动员的白细胞分离产品进行CD34选择。然后,使用程控冷冻系统将细胞在二甲基亚砜(终浓度7.5%)中冷冻至-90°C,再转移至气相液氮储存。在内部验证中,该方法显示平均CD34细胞活力为92%,平均CD34细胞回收率为99.7%。植入定义为连续3天绝对中性粒细胞计数≥0.5中的第一天。血小板恢复记录为连续7天血小板计数≥20 K/μL且未输血中的第一天。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS),并使用累积发病率函数估计复发率、非复发死亡率(NRM)和急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的发生率。共有64例患者接受了冷冻保存的经CD34选择的移植物。冷冻保存前CD34细胞计数中位数为6.6×10/kg(范围为1.4至16.1×10/kg),CD3细胞计数中位数为2.0×10/kg(范围为0至21.1×10/kg)。所有患者均实现植入,移植后中位时间为11天(范围为8至14天)。1例患者在巨细胞病毒血症情况下移植物功能不佳,需要在+57天进行一次经CD34选择的强化移植。血小板恢复的中位时间为16天(范围为13至99天)。冷冻保存移植物的估计2年总生存率为70%(95%置信区间[CI],58%至83%),而新鲜移植物为62%(95%CI,57%至67%)(风险比[HR],0.8;95%CI,0.54至1.35;P = 0.5)。两组的估计2年无复发生存率分别为59%(95%CI,48%至74%)和56%(95%CI,51%至61%;HR,1.01;95%CI,0.68至1.51;P > 0.9)。2年时复发的累积发生率分别为29%(9%CI,17%至)和23%(95%CI,19%至27%;P = 0.16),2年时非复发死亡率的累积发生率分别为17%(95%CI,9%至28%)和23%(95%CI,19%至)。至+100天II-IV级急性GVHD的累积发生率,冷冻保存移植物为16%(95%CI,8%至26%),新鲜移植物为16%(95%CI,13%至20%;P = 0.97)。至+365天,只有1例接受冷冻保存移植物的受者发生了中度至重度慢性GVHD(2%)。我们的数据表明,在接受冷冻保存的异基因CD34 HPCs的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中,植入、GVHD和生存结果与我们中心接受新鲜异基因CD34 HPC移植物的受者所见一致。我们的实验室验证和临床经验证明了我们对经CD34选择的同种异体移植物进行冷冻保存程序的安全性。

相似文献

1
Universal Engraftment after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Cryopreserved CD34-Selected Grafts.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Aug;27(8):697.e1-697.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 May 13.
3
Outcomes with allogeneic stem cell transplant using cryopreserved versus fresh hematopoietic progenitor cell products.
Cytotherapy. 2024 Oct;26(10):1210-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Real-World Experience of Cryopreserved Allogeneic Hematopoietic Grafts during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Report.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Apr;28(4):215.e1-215.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
6
Fractionated Infusion of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Does Not Improve Neutrophil Recovery or Survival in Allograft Recipients.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Oct;27(10):852.e1-852.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.06.022. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
7
Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Products During COVID-19 Pandemic: Graft Characterization and Engraftment Outcomes.
Transplant Proc. 2023 Oct;55(8):1799-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.03.070. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Pattern of Immune Reconstitution Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: Data From a Resource Constraint Country.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 23;16(8):e67566. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67566. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Secondary Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 19 Pandemic on Patients and the Cellular Therapy Healthcare Ecosystem.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Nov;28(11):737-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

3
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Cryopreserved Grafts for Severe Aplastic Anemia.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jul;26(7):e161-e166. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 8.
5
Co-Infections by Double-Stranded DNA Viruses after Ex Vivo T Cell-Depleted, CD34 Selected Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Oct;23(10):1759-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Cytomegalovirus Infection after CD34(+)-Selected Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Aug;22(8):1480-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 10.
8
10
Transportation and cryopreservation may impair haematopoietic stem cell function and engraftment of allogeneic PBSCs, but not BM.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jul;42(2):121-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.93. Epub 2008 Apr 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验