• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对科学的信任和对错误信息的信仰在政治倾向对疫苗犹豫和接种意愿的影响中起中介作用。

Trust in science and belief in misinformation mediate the effects of political orientation on vaccine hesitancy and intention to be vaccinated.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Department of Economy, Universitas Mercatorum, 00100 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jul;237:103945. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103945. Epub 2023 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103945
PMID:37210865
Abstract

In previous studies, anti-vaccination attitudes have been attributed either to far-right voters or to both far-left and far-right voters. The present study investigated the associations of political orientation with vaccine hesitancy and intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19, and the potential mediating roles of trust in science and belief in misinformation. A total of 750 Italian respondents completed an online questionnaire in the period between the second and the third wave of COVID-19 (from 9th March to 9th May 2021). The results showed that political orientation had both direct and indirect associations with vaccine hesitancy and vaccine intention, mediated by trust in science and belief in misinformation. Specifically, right-wing adherents were less trustful of scientists and believed in COVID-19-related misinformation more than left-wing adherents, and these two factors accounted for their higher vaccine hesitancy and reduced willingness to receive an anti-COVID-19 vaccination. Our findings are in line with the predictions of the mindsponge theory and suggest that communicative campaigns aimed at improving the rates of vaccine acceptance in right-wing adherents should be specifically focused on enhancing trust in science and reducing belief in misinformation.

摘要

在之前的研究中,反疫苗态度要么归因于极右翼选民,要么归因于极左和极右翼选民。本研究调查了政治取向与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫和接种意愿的关系,以及对科学的信任和对错误信息的信仰的潜在中介作用。共有 750 名意大利受访者在 COVID-19 第二波和第三波之间(2021 年 3 月 9 日至 5 月 9 日)完成了在线问卷。结果表明,政治取向与疫苗犹豫和疫苗接种意愿既有直接关系,也有间接关系,其通过对科学的信任和对错误信息的信仰来介导。具体来说,右翼信徒对科学家的信任度较低,对与 COVID-19 相关的错误信息的信任度较高,这两个因素导致他们对疫苗的犹豫程度更高,接种意愿降低。我们的发现符合心智海绵理论的预测,并表明旨在提高右翼信徒疫苗接种率的传播活动应特别侧重于增强对科学的信任和减少对错误信息的信仰。

相似文献

1
Trust in science and belief in misinformation mediate the effects of political orientation on vaccine hesitancy and intention to be vaccinated.对科学的信任和对错误信息的信仰在政治倾向对疫苗犹豫和接种意愿的影响中起中介作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jul;237:103945. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103945. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
Misinformation of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy.新冠疫苗错误信息和疫苗犹豫。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 11;12(1):13681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17430-6.
3
The psychological and behavioural correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the UK.爱尔兰和英国 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫和抵制的心理和行为相关性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 May;225:103550. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103550. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
Infodemic, Institutional Trust, and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-National Survey.信息疫情、机构信任与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:一项跨国调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138033.
5
Predicting the intention to receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine based on the health belief model.基于健康信念模型预测接种 COVID-19 加强疫苗的意愿。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jun;246:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104254. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
The Mediating Roles of Attitude Toward COVID-19 Vaccination, Trust in Science and Trust in Government in the Relationship Between Anti-vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs and Vaccination Intention.对新冠疫苗接种的态度、对科学的信任和对政府的信任在反疫苗阴谋论与接种意愿关系中的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:936917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936917. eCollection 2022.
7
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.关于 COVID-19 的错误信息:不同潜在特征的证据,以及与对科学的信任之间的强关联。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x.
8
Trust in government, intention to vaccinate and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A comparative survey of five large cities in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia.对政府的信任、接种意愿和对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:对美国、英国和澳大利亚五个大城市的比较调查。
Vaccine. 2022 Apr 14;40(17):2498-2505. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.048. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
Online misinformation is linked to early COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusal.网络错误信息与早期 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫和拒绝有关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 26;12(1):5966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10070-w.
10
Predicting vaccination hesitancy: The role of basic needs satisfaction and institutional trust.预测疫苗犹豫:基本需求满足和制度信任的作用。
Vaccine. 2024 Jun 11;42(16):3592-3600. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.068. Epub 2024 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Online Misinformation Susceptibility Scale: Development and Initial Validation.在线错误信息易感性量表:编制与初步验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 8;13(17):2252. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172252.
2
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Barriers to Vaccination: Comparing Perceptions Based on Vaccination Status.新冠病毒疫苗的有效性及接种障碍:基于接种状态的认知比较
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2.
3
Finding common ground: Understanding and engaging with science mistrust in the Great barrier reef region.
寻找共同点:理解和参与大堡礁地区的科学不信任。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 16;19(8):e0308252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308252. eCollection 2024.
4
Variations in Unmet Health Care Needs by Perceptions of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation, Frequency of Social Media Use, Medical Trust, and Medical Care Discrimination: Cross-Sectional Study.社交媒体健康错误和虚假信息认知、社交媒体使用频率、医疗信任和医疗保健歧视方面的未满足医疗需求的变化:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 11;10:e56881. doi: 10.2196/56881.
5
Variation in Trust in Cancer Information Sources by Perceptions of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation and by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults in the United States: Cross-Sectional Study.美国成年人中,社交媒体健康错误信息和虚假信息认知以及种族和民族因素对癌症信息来源信任度的影响:横断面研究
JMIR Cancer. 2024 May 8;10:e54162. doi: 10.2196/54162.
6
Use of immunology in news and YouTube videos in the context of COVID-19: politicisation and information bubbles.新冠疫情背景下新闻和YouTube视频中免疫学的运用:政治化与信息泡沫
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1327704. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1327704. eCollection 2024.
7
Perception and willingness toward various immunization routes for COVID-19 vaccines: a cross-sectional survey in China.公众对 COVID-19 疫苗各种接种途径的认知和意愿:中国的一项横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 25;11:1192709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1192709. eCollection 2023.
8
Impact of perceived ease of use, organizational support mechanism, and industry competitive pressure on physicians' use of liver cancer screening technology in medical alliances.感知易用性、组织支持机制和行业竞争压力对医疗联盟中医师使用肝癌筛查技术的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;11:1174334. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1174334. eCollection 2023.