REMOSS Research Group, Universidade de Vigo, Campus A Xunqueira s/n, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.
REMOSS Research Group, Universidade de Vigo, Campus A Xunqueira s/n, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain; Facultade de Fisioterapia, Universidade de Vigo, Campus A Xunqueira s/n, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 15.
Drowning is a public health problem. Interrupting the drowning process as soon as possible and starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can improve survival rates. Inflatable rescue boats (IRBs) are widely used worldwide to rescue drowning victims. Performing CPR in special circumstances requires adjusting the position based on the environment and space available. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of over-the-head resuscitation performed by rescuers aboard an IRB in comparison to standard CPR.
A quasi-experimental, quantitative, cross-sectional pilot study was conducted. Ten professional rescuers performed 1 min of simulated CPR on a QCPR Resuscy Anne manikin (Laerdal, Norway) sailing at 20 knots using two different techniques: 1) standard CPR (S-CPR) and 2) over-the-head CPR (OTH-CPR). Data were recorded through the APP QCPR Training (Laerdal, Norway).
The quality of CPR was similar between S-CPR (61%) and OTH-CPR (66%), with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.585). Both the percentage of compressions and the percentage of correct ventilations did not show significant differences (p > 0.05) between the techniques.
The rescuers can perform CPR maneuvers with acceptable quality in the IRB. The OTH-CPR technique did not show inferiority compared to S-CPR, making it a viable alternative when boat space or rescue conditions do not allow the conventional technique to be performed.
溺水是一个公共卫生问题。尽快中断溺水过程并开始心肺复苏(CPR)可以提高生存率。充气救生艇(IRB)在世界范围内被广泛用于营救溺水者。在特殊情况下进行 CPR 需要根据环境和可用空间调整位置。本研究旨在评估 IRB 上的救援人员进行过头 CPR 的质量,与标准 CPR 进行比较。
进行了一项准实验、定量、横断面的试点研究。10 名专业救援人员在使用两种不同技术的情况下,对 20 节航速行驶的 QCPR Resuscy Anne 模拟人进行了 1 分钟的模拟 CPR:1)标准 CPR(S-CPR)和 2)过头 CPR(OTH-CPR)。数据通过 QCPR Training APP(Laerdal,挪威)记录。
S-CPR(61%)和 OTH-CPR(66%)之间的 CPR 质量相似,无统计学差异(p=0.585)。两种技术的按压百分比和正确通气百分比均无显著差异(p>0.05)。
救援人员可以在 IRB 上进行具有可接受质量的 CPR 操作。与 S-CPR 相比,OTH-CPR 技术没有表现出劣势,因此在船空间或救援条件不允许进行常规技术时,是一种可行的替代方法。