Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University Centre for Reading, Sydney, Australia.
Laterality. 2023 Mar-May;28(2-3):122-191. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2023.2199963. Epub 2023 May 21.
Laterality indices (LIs) quantify the left-right asymmetry of brain and behavioural variables and provide a measure that is statistically convenient and seemingly easy to interpret. Substantial variability in how structural and functional asymmetries are recorded, calculated, and reported, however, suggest little agreement on the conditions required for its valid assessment. The present study aimed for consensus on general aspects in this context of laterality research, and more specifically within a particular method or technique (i.e., dichotic listening, visual half-field technique, performance asymmetries, preference bias reports, electrophysiological recording, functional MRI, structural MRI, and functional transcranial Doppler sonography). Experts in laterality research were invited to participate in an online Delphi survey to evaluate consensus and stimulate discussion. In Round 0, 106 experts generated 453 statements on what they considered good practice in their field of expertise. Statements were organised into a 295-statement survey that the experts then were asked, in Round 1, to independently assess for importance and support, which further reduced the survey to 241 statements that were presented again to the experts in Round 2. Based on the Round 2 input, we present a set of critically reviewed key recommendations to record, assess, and report laterality research for various methods.
侧性指数 (LIs) 量化了大脑和行为变量的左右不对称性,并提供了一种统计上方便且看似易于解释的度量。然而,结构和功能不对称性的记录、计算和报告方式存在很大差异,这表明在其有效评估所需的条件方面几乎没有达成一致意见。本研究旨在就侧性研究背景下的一般方面达成共识,更具体地说,是在特定方法或技术(即双耳分听、视觉半视野技术、表现不对称、偏好偏差报告、电生理记录、功能磁共振成像、结构磁共振成像和功能经颅多普勒超声)方面达成共识。侧性研究专家应邀参加在线 Delphi 调查,以评估共识并激发讨论。在第 0 轮中,106 名专家就他们认为在自己专业领域的良好实践方面生成了 453 条陈述。陈述被组织成一个包含 295 条陈述的调查,专家们在第 1 轮被要求独立评估重要性和支持度,这进一步将调查减少到 241 条陈述,这些陈述在第 2 轮再次提交给专家。基于第 2 轮的输入,我们提出了一套经过严格审查的关键建议,用于记录、评估和报告各种方法的侧性研究。