Mundorf Annakarina, Deneke Lisa, Ocklenburg Sebastian
ISM Institute for Systems Medicine, Department of Human Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Am Kaiserkai 1, Hamburg, 20457, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01888-8.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by increased mood reactivity and affective instability. Since core structures involved in emotion processing, such as the amygdala, demonstrate strong lateralization, BPD is an interesting target for laterality research. So far, a systematic integration of findings on lateralization in BPD is missing. Therefore, we systematically reviewed studies published until February 2024 in PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases that measured hemispheric asymmetries and behavioral lateralization in patients with BPD. Inclusion criteria were (a) diagnosis of BPD and (b) results on hemispheric or behavioral asymmetries. Specifically for neuroimaging studies, hemispheres need to be assessed separately. Review articles and studies with disorders other than BPD were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for non-randomized, non-comparative intervention studies. A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies investigated structural hemispheric asymmetries, five functional hemispheric asymmetries, two examined handedness, and one studied hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention. Overall, studies examining structural asymmetries in BPD report bilateral volume reduction in the amygdala and hippocampus but a right-sided reduction in the orbitofrontal cortex. For functional lateralization, asymmetrical de/activation patterns in the default mode network in BPD and reduced right-frontal asymmetry were evident. Also, studies indicate a trend towards increased non-right-handedness in BPD. Risk factors for BPD, such as childhood abuse, may play a crucial role in the development of structural and functional alterations. However, the generalization of results may be limited by small sample sizes and varying study designs.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的特征是情绪反应性增加和情感不稳定。由于参与情绪处理的核心结构,如杏仁核,表现出强烈的偏侧化,BPD是偏侧化研究的一个有趣目标。到目前为止,BPD偏侧化研究结果的系统整合尚缺。因此,我们系统回顾了截至2024年2月在PubMed、科学网和PsycInfo数据库中发表的测量BPD患者半球不对称性和行为偏侧化的研究。纳入标准为:(a)BPD诊断;(b)半球或行为不对称性结果。具体对于神经影像学研究,需要分别评估半球。排除综述文章和患有BPD以外疾病的研究。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表评估非随机、非对照干预研究的偏倚风险。共有21项研究符合纳入标准。13项研究调查了结构半球不对称性,5项研究了功能半球不对称性,2项研究了利手情况,1项研究了视觉空间注意力的半球不对称性。总体而言,研究BPD结构不对称性的研究报告称,杏仁核和海马体双侧体积减小,但眶额皮质右侧体积减小。对于功能偏侧化,BPD默认模式网络中的不对称去激活/激活模式以及右侧额叶不对称性降低很明显。此外,研究表明BPD中使用非右手的趋势增加。BPD的危险因素,如童年期虐待,可能在结构和功能改变的发展中起关键作用。然而,结果的普遍性可能受到小样本量和不同研究设计的限制。