• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间为肿瘤外科患者实施远程康复计划:观点和用户满意度。

Implementation of a teleprehabilitation program for oncosurgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives and user satisfaction.

机构信息

Hospital del Salvador, Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Oriente, 7500787, Santiago de Chile, Chile.

Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Maule, Talca, Chile.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 22;31(6):346. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07799-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-023-07799-z
PMID:37212973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10201043/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many rehabilitation services in the face of the COVID-19 health emergency have had to adapt face-to-face interventions with remote care through teleprehabilitation. We aim to describe the implementation of a teleprehabilitation program during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients who are candidates for elective cancer surgery in a low-income Chilean public hospital. Secondarily, describe the perspectives and satisfaction of patients with the program.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Correspond to a descriptive and retrospective pre-habilitation telemedicine intervention study. Implementation was measured in terms of, recruitment rate, retention, dropouts, and occurrence of adverse events. User perspectives and satisfaction were evaluated through a survey composed of nine items on a Likert scale with five response options. Descriptive analyses were considered with mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, as well as absolute and relative frequency. For patients' perspectives on the program, a qualitative analysis was considered to describe them. The most relevant domains were identified in a text box to illustrate the results.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five patients were referred to the teleprehabilitation program, with 99.3% recruitment, a retention rate of 46.7%, and no adverse events reported. In relation to user satisfaction, in general, patients showed good satisfaction with the teleprehabilitation program except items related to "access to the teleprehabilitation program connection" and "number of sessions." Thirty-three patients reported their perspectives on the intervention, represented in 12 domains.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to implement a teleprehabilitation program for oncosurgical patients in the context of preoperative care during the COVID-19 pandemic, with good user satisfaction. Likewise, this study provides guidance for other health institutions that wish to implement a teleprehabilitation program.

摘要

简介

在 COVID-19 健康紧急情况下,许多康复服务机构不得不将面对面干预改为远程康复的远程康复。我们旨在描述在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在一家智利低收入公立医院中,为接受择期癌症手术的患者实施远程康复计划的情况。其次,描述患者对该计划的看法和满意度。

材料和方法

这是一项描述性和回顾性的远程康复医学干预研究。实施情况通过招募率、保留率、脱落率和不良事件发生率来衡量。通过包含九个项目的李克特量表调查问卷评估用户的观点和满意度,共有五个回答选项。采用均值、标准差、最小值、最大值以及绝对和相对频率进行描述性分析。对于患者对该计划的看法,考虑进行定性分析来描述他们。在文本框中确定了最相关的领域来举例说明结果。

结果

共有 155 名患者被转介到远程康复计划,招募率为 99.3%,保留率为 46.7%,未报告不良事件。关于用户满意度,总的来说,患者对远程康复计划的满意度较高,但对“访问远程康复计划连接”和“疗程数”项目的满意度较低。33 名患者报告了他们对干预的看法,涵盖了 12 个领域。

结论

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在术前护理背景下,为肿瘤外科患者实施远程康复计划是可行的,且用户满意度较高。此外,本研究为其他希望实施远程康复计划的医疗机构提供了指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8362/10201043/88247bbee13d/520_2023_7799_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8362/10201043/a966e0aabcb1/520_2023_7799_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8362/10201043/88247bbee13d/520_2023_7799_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8362/10201043/a966e0aabcb1/520_2023_7799_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8362/10201043/88247bbee13d/520_2023_7799_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a teleprehabilitation program for oncosurgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives and user satisfaction.在 COVID-19 大流行期间为肿瘤外科患者实施远程康复计划:观点和用户满意度。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 22;31(6):346. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07799-z.
2
Functional results and feasibility of a teleprehabilitation program in patients who are candidates for elective colorectal cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对择期结直肠癌手术患者进行远程康复计划的功能结果和可行性。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr;20(2):251-258. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13939. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
3
Successes and challenges of implementing teleprehabilitation for onco-surgical candidates and patients' experience: a retrospective pilot-cohort study.开展肿瘤外科候选者和患者远程康复的成功与挑战:回顾性试点队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 26;12(1):6775. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10810-y.
4
A Nationwide Natural Experiment of e-Health Implementation during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland: User Satisfaction and the Ease-of-Use of Remote Physician's Visits.一项关于 COVID-19 大流行期间波兰电子医疗实施的全国自然实验:用户满意度和远程医生访视的易用性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148338.
5
In a Pandemic That Limits Contact, Can Videoconferencing Enable Interdisciplinary Persistent Pain Services and What Are the Patient's Perspectives?在限制接触的大流行中,视频会议是否能使跨学科持续性疼痛服务成为可能,以及患者的看法是什么?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Mar;103(3):418-423. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.018. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
6
Teleprehabilitation during COVID-19 pandemic: the essentials of "what" and "how".新冠疫情期间的远程康复:“是什么”和“怎么做”的要点。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):551-554. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05768-4. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Development and Validation of an Instrument in Spanish to Evaluate Patient Satisfaction in Telemedicine Consultation During COVID-19 Pandemic.一种用于评估 COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗咨询中患者满意度的西班牙语工具的开发与验证
Telemed J E Health. 2022 May;28(5):736-742. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0320. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
8
Patient and Provider-Reported Satisfaction of Cancer Rehabilitation Telemedicine Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间癌症康复远程医疗就诊的患者和提供者满意度。
PM R. 2021 Dec;13(12):1362-1368. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12552. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
Reflecting on Plastic Surgery Training During Early COVID-19 Pandemic: Resident Exposure and Telemedicine.反思 COVID-19 大流行早期的整形外科学培训:住院医师的接触和远程医疗。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Sep 1;33(6):1820-1824. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008471. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
10
Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study.菲律宾 COVID-19 大流行期间的远程医疗患者满意度:混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 22;23(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09127-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review.远程康复治疗在康复人群中应用相关的不良事件:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 19;19(11):e0313440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313440. eCollection 2024.
2
The use of technology in cancer prehabilitation: a systematic review.癌症康复前技术应用的系统评价
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 19;14:1321493. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1321493. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of an asynchronous telerehabilitation program in post-COVID-19 patients: A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.基于远程康复的新型干预方案对新冠后患者康复疗效的随机对照试验研究方案
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0270766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270766. eCollection 2022.
2
A systematic review of impact of person-centred interventions for serious physical illness in terms of outcomes and costs.一项关于以患者为中心的干预措施对严重躯体疾病的影响(从结果和成本方面考量)的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e054386. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054386.
3
Telerehabilitation for Patients with Cancer: A Scoping Review.
远程康复在癌症患者中的应用:一项范围综述。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:543-546. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220136.
4
PRehabIlitatiOn with pReoperatIve exercise and educaTion for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgerY: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled TRIAL (PRIORITY TRIAL).术前运动和教育康复用于接受大型腹部癌症手术患者的康复治疗:一项多中心随机对照试验的方案(PRIORITY 试验)。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09492-6.
5
Telerehabilitation for lower extremity recovery poststroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.远程康复治疗脑卒中后下肢恢复:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e055527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055527.
6
Adherence, Efficacy, and Safety of Wearable Technology-Assisted Combined Home-Based Exercise in Chinese Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Randomized Pilot Controlled Clinical Trial.可穿戴技术辅助联合家庭运动在中轴型脊柱关节炎患者中的依从性、疗效和安全性:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 18;24(1):e29703. doi: 10.2196/29703.
7
Telerehabilitation's Safety, Feasibility, and Exercise Uptake in Cancer Survivors: Process Evaluation.远程康复在癌症幸存者中的安全性、可行性及运动参与情况:过程评估
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Dec 21;7(4):e33130. doi: 10.2196/33130.
8
Effectiveness of a Primary Care Telerehabilitation Program for Post-COVID-19 Patients: A Feasibility Study.针对新冠后患者的初级保健远程康复计划的有效性:一项可行性研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 27;10(19):4428. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194428.
9
Test-Retest Reliability of Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSST) in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人五次坐立试验(FTSST)的重测信度:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Biology (Basel). 2021 Jun 9;10(6):510. doi: 10.3390/biology10060510.
10
The Feasibility and Effects of a Telehealth-Delivered Home-Based Prehabilitation Program for Cancer Patients during the Pandemic.疫情期间远程医疗居家康复计划在癌症患者中的可行性和效果。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jun 17;28(3):2248-2259. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030207.