Evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes and the incidence of adjacent proximal segment degenerative disease with algorithmic transforaminal interbody fusion: A multicenter prospective study.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND

Adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASDd) is a common complication of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (O-TLIF), the leading cause of which is initial adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). To date, various surgical techniques for the prevention of ASDd have been developed, such as, simultaneous use of interspinous stabilization (IS) and preventive rigid stabilization of the adjacent segment. The use of these technologies is often based on the subjective opinion of the operating surgeon, or on the assessment of one of the predictors of ASDd. Only sporadic studies are devoted to a comprehensive study of risk factors of ASDd development and personalized performance of O-TLIF.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and the incidence of degenerative disease of the adjacent proximal segment using clinical-instrumental algorithm for preoperative planning to O-TLIF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter cohort study included 351 patients who underwent primary O-TLIF, and the adjacent proximal segment had initial ASD. Two cohorts were identified. The prospective cohort included 186 patients who were operated by using the algorithm of personalized O-TLIF performance. The control retrospective cohort consisted of patients ( = 165), from our own database who had been operated on previously without the algorithmized approach. Treatment outcomes were analyzed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessment of pain syndrome, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) scores of the Short Form 36 questionnaire, frequency of ASDd was compared between studied cohorts.

RESULTS

Thirty-six months after follow-up, the prospective cohort had better SF36 MCS/PCS outcomes, less disability according to ODI, and lower pain level according to VAS ( < 0.05). The incidence of ASDd in the prospective cohort was 4.9%, which was significantly lower than in the retrospective cohort (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prospective use of a clinical-instrumental algorithm for preoperative planning of rigid stabilization, depending on the biometric parameters of the proximal adjacent segment, significantly reduced the incidence of ASDd and improved long-term clinical outcomes compared with the retrospective group.