Department of Medical Law, Faculty of Law, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Department of Civil Law, Faculty of Law, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Front Public Health. 2023 May 4;11:1184971. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1184971. eCollection 2023.
Telemedicine, understood as the provision of health care by a health professional to a patient who is physically not in the same location as the health professional, has many actual and potential benefits. It also has some disadvantages though, including a higher risk of misdiagnosis or another unfavorable outcome of certain remotely-provided services. In principle, the regime of legal liability for medical malpractice is the same for telemedicine as for traditional physical care. The general outline of the standard of care, which includes respect for medical science, the patient's individuality and objective possibilities, is abstract and flexible enough to be used for remote care without the need for redefinition. The quality of health care should be evaluated on the basis of the whole scale of risks and benefits it brings to a particular patient, including accessibility and comfort. In general, it should be permissible to provide a medical service remotely on the condition that its overall quality is at least as good as its comparable physical alternative. In other words, certain decrease in quality of some aspects of remote care can be compensated by other advantages. In terms of public health, support for telemedicine may bring a great improvement in the access to health care, and thus help significantly the individual members of the population. From the individual perspective, respect for personal autonomy implies that a patient should have every right to opt for a remote service, provided that there exists a true choice between meaningful options which is made on the basis of full information. If telemedicine is to fulfill its potential without sacrificing the protection of patients and their rights, reasonable guidelines for remote services need to be defined for particular medical fields, and for specific procedures within them. Among other issues, these guidelines must address the question of when it is necessary to refer the patient to physical care.
远程医疗是指医疗专业人员通过电子通讯为身处异地的患者提供医疗服务。远程医疗有许多实际和潜在的好处,但也存在一些缺点,例如远程提供的某些服务误诊或其他不良后果的风险更高。原则上,医疗事故的法律责任制度对远程医疗和传统的实体医疗是相同的。医疗标准的大致轮廓包括尊重医学科学、患者的个体性和客观可能性,这个标准足够抽象和灵活,可以用于远程医疗,而无需重新定义。医疗服务的质量应该根据它给特定患者带来的风险和收益的整体情况来评估,包括可及性和舒适度。一般来说,只要远程医疗服务的整体质量至少与其可比的实体替代方案一样好,就可以允许远程提供医疗服务。换句话说,远程医疗服务的某些方面质量的下降可以通过其他优势来弥补。从公共卫生的角度来看,支持远程医疗可能会极大地改善医疗服务的可及性,从而显著惠及人口中的个体成员。从个人角度来看,尊重个人自主权意味着患者应该有权选择远程服务,只要在充分了解的基础上,在有真正选择的情况下,患者可以自由选择。如果远程医疗要在不牺牲对患者及其权利的保护的情况下发挥其潜力,就需要为特定的医疗领域和其中的特定程序制定远程服务的合理准则。除其他问题外,这些准则必须解决何时需要将患者转介到实体医疗的问题。