• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对晚期癌症患者对肿瘤基因组分析中二级胚系结果的感知效用的新型测量方法的开发。

Development of a novel measure of advanced cancer patients' perceived utility of secondary germline findings from tumor genomic profiling.

作者信息

Hamilton Jada G, Shah Ibrahim H, Salafia Caroline, Schofield Elizabeth, Garzon Margaux Genoff, Cadet Kechna, Stadler Zsofia K, Hay Jennifer L, Offit Kenneth, Robson Mark E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 Jan 19;2:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100124. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100124
PMID:37214538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10194097/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) can inform advanced cancer patients' treatment decisions, and also reveal secondary germline findings-information about inherited risks for cancer and other disorders. We sought to develop a measure of patient perceptions of the clinical and personal utility of secondary germline findings.

METHODS

We developed a draft survey based on literature and patient interview data (=40). We evaluated and refined the survey through cognitive interviews with advanced cancer patients who received secondary germline findings from TGP (=10). The survey was psychometrically validated with data from two independent samples of advanced cancer patients undergoing TGP (total =349).

RESULTS

Cognitive interviews offered opportunities for survey refinement and confirmation of its comprehensible nature. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the survey identified 16 items across three subscales with strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.79): perceived utility for others, perceived utility for self and health, and confidence in secondary findings.

CONCLUSION

We developed a novel valid scale with promise for measuring advanced cancer patients' perceptions of the utility of secondary germline findings.

INNOVATION

We offer a new patient-derived measure of perceived utility of and confidence in secondary germline findings with potential applications for precision oncology research and clinical communication.

摘要

目的

肿瘤基因组分析(TGP)可为晚期癌症患者的治疗决策提供依据,还能揭示二级种系研究结果——有关癌症及其他疾病遗传风险的信息。我们试图制定一种衡量患者对二级种系研究结果临床及个人效用认知的方法。

方法

我们根据文献和患者访谈数据(n = 40)制定了一份初步调查问卷。我们通过对10名接受TGP二级种系研究结果的晚期癌症患者进行认知访谈,对该调查问卷进行评估和完善。利用来自两个接受TGP的晚期癌症患者独立样本的数据(共349例)对该调查问卷进行了心理测量学验证。

结果

认知访谈为完善调查问卷并确认其易懂性提供了机会。对该调查问卷进行探索性和验证性因素分析,确定了三个分量表中的16个项目,内部一致性较强(克朗巴哈系数≥0.79):对他人的感知效用、对自身及健康的感知效用以及对二级研究结果的信心。

结论

我们开发了一种新型有效量表,有望用于衡量晚期癌症患者对二级种系研究结果效用的认知。

创新点

我们提供了一种新的源自患者的对二级种系研究结果感知效用及信心的测量方法,在精准肿瘤学研究和临床沟通方面具有潜在应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a36f/10194097/4e7b44383c98/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a36f/10194097/00617ed28dd4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a36f/10194097/4e7b44383c98/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a36f/10194097/00617ed28dd4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a36f/10194097/4e7b44383c98/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a novel measure of advanced cancer patients' perceived utility of secondary germline findings from tumor genomic profiling.一种针对晚期癌症患者对肿瘤基因组分析中二级胚系结果的感知效用的新型测量方法的开发。
PEC Innov. 2023 Jan 19;2:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100124. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Interest and Attitudes of Patients With Advanced Cancer With Regard to Secondary Germline Findings From Tumor Genomic Profiling.晚期癌症患者对肿瘤基因组分析中二级胚系发现的兴趣和态度
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jul;13(7):e590-e601. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.020057. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Oncologists' perceptions of tumor genomic profiling and barriers to communicating secondary hereditary risks to African American cancer patients.肿瘤学家对肿瘤基因组分析的看法,以及向非裔美国癌症患者传达二级遗传风险的障碍。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12184-y.
4
Decision-Making Preferences About Secondary Germline Findings That Arise From Tumor Genomic Profiling Among Patients With Advanced Cancers.晚期癌症患者中肿瘤基因组分析产生的二级胚系发现的决策偏好
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;1. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00182. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Somatic tumor mutations in moderate risk cancer genes: Targets for germline confirmatory testing.中等风险癌症基因中的体细胞肿瘤突变:种系确认检测的靶点。
Cancer Genet. 2022 Nov;268-269:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Oncologists' Perceptions of Tumor Genomic Profiling and the Communication of Test Results and Risks.肿瘤学家对肿瘤基因组分析的看法以及检测结果和风险的沟通。
Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(5-6):304-309. doi: 10.1159/000517486. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Identification and Confirmation of Potentially Actionable Germline Mutations in Tumor-Only Genomic Sequencing.仅肿瘤基因组测序中潜在可操作胚系突变的鉴定与确认
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00076. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Understanding perceptions of tumor genomic profile testing in Black/African American cancer patients in a qualitative study: the role of medical mistrust, provider communication, and family support.在一项定性研究中了解黑人/非裔美国癌症患者对肿瘤基因组谱检测的看法:医疗不信任、医护人员沟通及家庭支持的作用
J Community Genet. 2024 Jun;15(3):281-292. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00700-3. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
9
Development and validation of safety climate scales for mobile remote workers using utility/electrical workers as exemplar.开发并验证使用电力/电工作为范例的移动远程工作者安全氛围量表。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 10.
10
Yield and Utility of Germline Testing Following Tumor Sequencing in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者肿瘤测序后种系检测的产量和效用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19452.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient survey on cancer genomic medicine in Japan under the national health insurance system.日本国民健康保险制度下的癌症基因组医学患者调查。
Cancer Sci. 2024 Mar;115(3):954-962. doi: 10.1111/cas.16065. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
2
Communication in genomic and precision medicine: Editorial - .基因组学与精准医学中的交流:编者按 -
PEC Innov. 2023 Jan 25;2:100126. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100126. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The PrU: Development and validation of a measure to assess personal utility of genomic results.PrU:评估基因组结果个人效用的衡量标准的制定和验证。
Genet Med. 2023 Mar;25(3):100356. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.12.003. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
2
Perceived Utility of Genomic Sequencing: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis of a Conceptual Model to Inform Patient-Centered Instrument Development.基因组测序的感知效用:概念模型的定性分析和综合,为以患者为中心的仪器开发提供信息。
Patient. 2022 May;15(3):317-328. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00558-4. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)关于临床外显子组和基因组测序中次要发现报告的ACMG SF v3.0清单:一项政策声明
Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1381-1390. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01172-3. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Patients' and Oncologists' Knowledge and Expectations Regarding Tumor Multigene Next-Generation Sequencing: A Narrative Review.患者和肿瘤学家对肿瘤多基因下一代测序的知识和期望:叙事性综述。
Oncologist. 2021 Aug;26(8):e1359-e1371. doi: 10.1002/onco.13783. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review.从父母/照顾者角度看基因检测的效用:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2021 Mar 27;8(4):259. doi: 10.3390/children8040259.
6
Motivations and barriers to pursue cancer genomic testing: A systematic review.探索癌症基因组检测的动机和障碍:系统综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.024. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
7
20th Anniversary Update of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework Part 1: A Systematic Review of the Decisional Needs of People Making Health or Social Decisions.《渥太华决策支持框架》20周年更新 第1部分:对做出健康或社会决策者决策需求的系统评价
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jul;40(5):555-581. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20936209. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
Advanced cancer patient preferences for receiving molecular profiling results.晚期癌症患者对接受分子谱分析结果的偏好。
Psychooncology. 2020 Oct;29(10):1533-1539. doi: 10.1002/pon.5446. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
9
20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework.第 20 届渥太华决策支持框架周年纪念:第 3 部分 系统评价概述和更新框架。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):379-398. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20911870.
10
Points to consider for reporting of germline variation in patients undergoing tumor testing: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).肿瘤检测患者种系变异报告的注意事项:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)声明
Genet Med. 2020 Jul;22(7):1142-1148. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0783-8. Epub 2020 Apr 23.