Iapaolo Fabio
Oxford, UK Faculty of Technology, Design and Environment, Oxford Brookes University.
AI Soc. 2023;38(3):1111-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01590-0. Epub 2023 May 8.
Focused on city-scale automation, and using self-driving cars (SDCs) as a case study, this article reflects on the role of AI-and in particular, computer vision systems used for mapping and navigation-as a catalyst for urban transformation. Urban research commonly presents AI and cities as having a one-way cause-and-effect relationship, giving undue weight to AI's impact on cities and overlooking the role of cities in shaping AI. Working at the intersection of data science and social research, this paper aims to counter this trend by exploring the reverse perspective: how do cities affect the development, and expose the present limits, of SDCs? The contribution of this paper is threefold. First, by comparing urban and nonurban environments and thoroughly examining the relationship between computer vision and city-specific sociality and form, it defines machine autonomy/automation as a function of the sociotechnical milieu in which an AI system operates. Second, and related, the paper problematizes the notion of SDCs as autonomous technologies and the role it plays in envisioning contending policy arrangements and technical solutions for achieving full driving automation. Finally, the article offers insight into a materialist and spatialized understanding of AI-namely, not as an abstract quality susceptible to replication within discrete machines, but rather as a distributed property emerging through embodied interactions among a multiplicity of agents (human, non-human, and technological) within/with their environments.
本文聚焦于城市规模的自动化,并以自动驾驶汽车(SDC)为例进行研究,探讨了人工智能,特别是用于地图绘制和导航的计算机视觉系统,作为城市转型催化剂的作用。城市研究通常将人工智能与城市呈现为单向的因果关系,过度强调人工智能对城市的影响,而忽视了城市在塑造人工智能方面的作用。本文从数据科学与社会研究的交叉点出发,旨在通过探索相反的视角来扭转这一趋势:城市如何影响自动驾驶汽车的发展,并揭示其目前的局限性?本文的贡献主要体现在三个方面。首先,通过比较城市和非城市环境,并深入研究计算机视觉与特定城市社会性和形态之间的关系,将机器自主性/自动化定义为人工智能系统运行所处社会技术环境的一种功能。其次,与之相关的是,本文对自动驾驶汽车作为自主技术的概念及其在设想实现完全驾驶自动化的竞争政策安排和技术解决方案中所起的作用提出了质疑。最后,本文提供了一种对人工智能的唯物主义和空间化理解——即,人工智能并非一种可在离散机器中复制的抽象属性,而是通过多种主体(人类、非人类和技术)在其环境中/与环境的具体互动而产生的一种分布式属性。