University College London, London, UK.
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Dec;51(6):846-870. doi: 10.1177/03063127211038752. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
The ideal of the self-driving car replaces an error-prone human with an infallible, artificially intelligent driver. This narrative of autonomy promises liberation from the downsides of automobility, even if that means taking control away from autonomous, free-moving individuals. We look behind this narrative to understand the attachments that so-called 'autonomous' vehicles (AVs) are likely to have to the world. Drawing on 50 interviews with AV developers, researchers and other stakeholders, we explore the social and technological attachments that stakeholders see inside the vehicle, on the road and with the wider world. These range from software and hardware to the behaviours of other road users and the material, social and economic infrastructure that supports driving and self-driving. We describe how innovators understand, engage with or seek to escape from these attachments in three categories: 'brute force', which sees attachments as problems to be solved with more data, 'solve the world one place at a time', which sees attachments as limits on the technology's reach and 'reduce the complexity of the space', which sees attachments as solutions to the problems encountered by technology developers. Understanding attachments provides a powerful way to anticipate various possible constitutions for the technology.
自动驾驶汽车的理想是以一个不会犯错的人工智能司机取代易犯错的人类驾驶员。这种自动驾驶的叙事承诺将人们从机动性的负面因素中解放出来,即使这意味着要将控制权从自主、自由移动的个人手中夺走。我们深入研究这一叙事,以了解所谓的“自动驾驶”车辆(AV)可能与世界的联系。我们对 50 名自动驾驶汽车开发者、研究人员和其他利益相关者进行了采访,探讨了利益相关者在车内、道路上以及与更广泛的世界之间看到的社会和技术联系。这些联系范围从软件和硬件到其他道路使用者的行为,以及支持驾驶和自动驾驶的物质、社会和经济基础设施。我们描述了创新者如何在以下三个类别中理解、参与或试图摆脱这些联系:“暴力”,将联系视为需要更多数据才能解决的问题;“一次解决一个地方的问题”,将联系视为技术影响范围的限制;“降低空间的复杂性”,将联系视为技术开发者遇到的问题的解决方案。了解这些联系为预测技术的各种可能结构提供了一种强大的方法。