Testing the Webber's Comprehensive Mobility Framework Using Self-Reported and Performance-Based Mobility Outcomes Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In 2010, Webber and colleagues conceptualized the interrelationships between mobility determinants, and researchers tested Webber's framework using data from developed countries. No studies have tested this model using data from developing nations (e.g., Nigeria). This study aimed to simultaneously explore the cognitive, environmental, financial, personal, physical, psychological, and social influences and their interaction effects on the mobility outcomes among community-dwelling older adults in Nigeria.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited 227 older adults (mean age [standard deviation] = 66.6 [6.8] years). Performance-based mobility outcomes included gait speed, balance, and lower extremity strength, and were assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery, whereas the self-reported mobility outcomes included inability to walk 0.5 km, 2 km, or climb a flight of stairs, assessed using the Manty Preclinical Mobility Limitation Scale. Regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of mobility outcomes.

RESULTS

The number of comorbidities (physical factor) negatively predicted all mobility outcomes, except the lower extremity strength. Age (personal factor) negatively predicted gait speed (β = -0.192), balance (β = -0.515), and lower extremity strength (β = -0.225), and a history of no exercise (physical factor) positively predicted inability to walk 0.5 km ( = 1.401), 2 km ( = 1.295). Interactions between determinants improved the model, explaining the most variations in all the mobility outcomes. Living arrangement is the only factor that consistently interacted with other variables to improve the regression model for all mobility outcomes, except balance and self-reported inability to walk 2 km.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Interactions between determinants explain the most variations in all mobility outcomes, highlighting the complexity of mobility. This finding highlighted that factors predicting self-reported and performance-based mobility outcomes might differ, but this should be confirmed with a large data set.