Professor, Kinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DRC.
Associate Professor, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2207279. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2207279.
The changing abortion legal and practice landscape in the DRC in recent years calls for a re-examining of induced abortion experiences. The current study provides population-level estimates of induced abortion incidence and safety by women's characteristics in two provinces using direct and indirect approaches to assess indirect method performance. We use representative survey data on women aged 15-49 in Kinshasa and Kongo Central collected from December 2021 to April 2022. The survey had questions on respondents' and their closest friends' experience with induced abortion, including methods and sources used. We estimated one-year abortion incidence and proportion using non-recommended methods and sources overall and by background characteristics for each province separately for respondents and friends. The fully adjusted one-year friend abortion rate was 105.3 per 1000 women of reproductive age in Kinshasa and 44.3 per 1000 in Kongo Central in 2021; these were substantially higher than corresponding respondent estimates. Women earlier in their reproductive lifespan were more likely to have had a recent abortion. Approximately 17.0% of abortions in Kinshasa and one-third of abortions in Kongo Central involved non-recommended methods and sources according to respondent and friend estimates. The more accurate friend abortion incidence estimates indicate that women in the DRC often rely on abortion to regulate their fertility. Many use non-recommended means and sources to terminate, thus, significant work remains to actualise the commitments made in the Maputo Protocol to provide comprehensive reproductive health services that combine primary and secondary prevention services to reduce unsafe abortion and its consequences.
近年来,刚果民主共和国(DRC)的堕胎法律和实践环境发生了变化,因此需要重新审视人工流产的经验。本研究通过直接和间接方法评估间接方法的性能,利用两省具有代表性的 15-49 岁妇女调查数据,提供了按妇女特征分类的人工流产发生率和安全性的人群水平估计。我们使用了 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 4 月在金沙萨和刚果中央省收集的关于 15-49 岁妇女的代表性调查数据。调查问题涉及受访者及其最亲密朋友的人工流产经历,包括使用的方法和来源。我们分别按背景特征为每个省的受访者和朋友单独估计了一年期整体和非推荐方法和来源的人工流产发生率和比例。2021 年,金沙萨的完全调整后的一年期朋友堕胎率为每 1000 名育龄妇女 105.3 例,而刚果中央省为每 1000 名 44.3 例;这些比率明显高于相应的受访者估计。生育期较早的妇女更有可能最近堕胎。根据受访者和朋友的估计,金沙萨约有 17.0%的堕胎和刚果中央省三分之一的堕胎涉及非推荐方法和来源。更准确的朋友堕胎发生率估计表明,刚果民主共和国的妇女经常依靠堕胎来调节生育能力。许多人使用非推荐的方法和来源来终止妊娠,因此,为了实现《马普托议定书》中的承诺,还有大量工作要做,以提供综合生殖健康服务,将初级和二级预防服务结合起来,减少不安全堕胎及其后果。