• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中围产期焦虑管理的非药物干预措施:系统评价的元综述

Non-pharmacological interventions for the management of perinatal anxiety in primary care: a meta-review of systematic reviews.

作者信息

Silverwood Victoria, Bullock Laurna, Jordan Joanne, Turner Katrina, Chew-Graham Carolyn A, Kingstone Tom, Dawson Shoba

机构信息

School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK

School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2023 Sep 19;7(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0022. Print 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0022
PMID:37217213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10646202/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perinatal anxiety (PNA), anxiety that occurs during pregnancy and/or up to 12 months postpartum, is estimated to affect up to 21% of women, and may impact negatively on mothers, children, and their families. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has called for further research around non-pharmacological interventions in primary care for PNA.

AIM

To summarise the available international evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for women with PNA in a primary care population.

DESIGN & SETTING: A meta-review of systematic reviews (SRs) with narrative synthesis was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance.

METHOD

Systematic literature searches were conducted in 11 health-related databases up to June 2022. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were dual-screened against pre-defined eligibility criteria. A variety of study designs were included. Data were extracted about study participants, intervention design, and context. Quality appraisal was performed using the AMSTAR 2 tool (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews). A patient and public involvement group informed and contributed towards this meta-review.

RESULTS

Twenty-four SRs were included in the meta-review. Interventions were grouped into the following six categories for analysis purposes: psychological therapies; mind-body activities; emotional support from healthcare professionals (HCPs); peer support; educational activities; and alternative or complementary therapies.

CONCLUSION

In addition to pharmacological and psychological therapies, this meta-review has demonstrated that there are many more options available for women to choose from that might be effective to manage their PNA. Evidence gaps are present in several intervention categories. Primary care clinicians and commissioners should endeavour to provide patients with a choice of these management options, promoting individual choice and patient-centred care.

摘要

背景

围产期焦虑(PNA)是指在孕期和/或产后12个月内出现的焦虑,估计影响高达21%的女性,可能对母亲、儿童及其家庭产生负面影响。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)呼吁围绕初级保健中针对PNA的非药物干预措施开展进一步研究。

目的

总结关于初级保健人群中患有PNA的女性的非药物干预措施的现有国际证据。

设计与背景

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对系统评价(SRs)进行了Meta综述,并进行叙述性综合分析。

方法

截至2022年6月,在11个与健康相关的数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。根据预先定义的纳入标准对标题、摘要和全文文章进行双人筛选。纳入了多种研究设计。提取了有关研究参与者、干预设计和背景的数据。使用AMSTAR 2工具(一种评估系统评价的测量工具)进行质量评估。一个患者和公众参与小组为该Meta综述提供了信息并做出了贡献。

结果

Meta综述纳入了24项SRs。为了分析目的,将干预措施分为以下六类:心理治疗;身心活动;医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的情感支持;同伴支持;教育活动;以及替代或补充疗法。

结论

除了药物和心理治疗外,该Meta综述表明,还有更多可供女性选择的选项,可能对管理她们的PNA有效。几个干预类别中存在证据空白。初级保健临床医生和专员应努力为患者提供这些管理选项的选择,促进个人选择和以患者为中心的护理。

相似文献

1
Non-pharmacological interventions for the management of perinatal anxiety in primary care: a meta-review of systematic reviews.基层医疗中围产期焦虑管理的非药物干预措施:系统评价的元综述
BJGP Open. 2023 Sep 19;7(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0022. Print 2023 Sep.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
6
How can we improve support for women with perinatal anxiety in primary care? A qualitative study.如何在基层医疗中加强对围产期焦虑女性的支持?一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 20;74(suppl 1):bjgp24X737481. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X737481.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Approach for Investigating the Effect of Music Therapy on Perioperative Anxiety and Postoperative Satisfaction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lower-Limb Fracture Surgery Under Intravertebral Anesthesia: A Prospective Clinical Study.研究椎管内麻醉下老年下肢骨折手术患者音乐疗法对围手术期焦虑及术后满意度影响的新方法:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Noise Health. 2024;26(122):312-319. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_47_24. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement.医疗干预措施系统评价概述报告规范:PRIOR 声明的制定。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 9;378:e070849. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070849.
2
Effect of mindfulness-based interventions on mental health of perinatal women with or without current mental health issues: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于正念的干预措施对有或无当前心理健康问题的围产期妇女心理健康的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2022 May 15;305:102-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
3
Remotely Delivered Interventions to Support Women With Symptoms of Anxiety in Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
远程干预措施支持妊娠焦虑症状女性:混合方法系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 15;24(2):e28093. doi: 10.2196/28093.
4
Prenatal Anxiety and Exercise. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.产前焦虑与运动。系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 24;10(23):5501. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235501.
5
The effectiveness of psychological interventions for pregnant women with anxiety in the antenatal period: A systematic review.产前焦虑孕妇心理干预的效果:系统评价。
Midwifery. 2022 Jan;104:103169. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103169. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce anxiety in pregnancy, labour and postpartum: A systematic review.非药物干预措施以减少妊娠、分娩和产后焦虑:系统评价。
Midwifery. 2021 Nov;102:103126. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103126. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
7
Effects, Side Effects and Contraindications of Relaxation Massage during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.孕期放松按摩的效果、副作用及禁忌:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 6;10(16):3485. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163485.
8
Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews.管理系统评价中主要研究结果的重叠:综述作者在综述中的实际考虑因素。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jul 7;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01269-y.
9
Effectiveness of Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic Supplementation to Improve Perinatal Mental Health in Mothers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.补充益生菌、益生元及合生元改善母亲围产期心理健康的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 22;12:622181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.622181. eCollection 2021.
10
Effectiveness of digital psychotherapeutic intervention among perinatal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.围产期妇女数字心理治疗干预的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 19;11(4):133-152. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i4.133.