Department of Radiation Oncology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Radiat Oncol. 2023 May 22;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02266-9.
In stereotactic radiotherapy, dose is prescribed to an isodose surrounding the planning target volume (PTV). However, the desired dose inhomogeneity inside the PTV leaves the specific dose distribution to the gross tumor volume (GTV) unspecified. A simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) to the GTV could solve this shortcoming. In a retrospective planning study with 20 unresected brain metastases, a SIB approach was tested against the classical prescription.
For all metastases, the GTV was isotropically enlarged by 3 mm to a PTV. Two plans were generated, one according to the classical 80% concept with 5 times 7 Gy prescribed (on D) to the 80% PTV surrounding isodose (with D(PTV) ≥ 35 Gy), and the other one following a SIB concept with 5 times 8.5 Gy average GTV dose and with D(PTV) ≥ 35 Gy as additional requirement. Plan pairs were compared in terms of homogeneity inside GTV, high dose in PTV rim around GTV, and dose conformity and gradients around PTV using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test.
The SIB concept was superior to the classical 80% concept concerning dose homogeneity inside GTV: Heterogeneity index of GTV was in the SIB concept (median 0.0513, range 0.0397-0.0757) significantly (p = 0.001) lower than in the 80% concept (median 0.0894, range 0.0447-0.1872). Dose gradients around PTV were not inferior. The other examined measures were comparable.
Our stereotactic SIB concept better defines the dose distribution inside PTV and can be considered for clinical use.
在立体定向放射治疗中,剂量是根据计划靶区(PTV)周围的等剂量线来规定的。然而,PTV 内所需的不均匀剂量分布使得大体肿瘤体积(GTV)的具体剂量分布无法确定。对 GTV 进行同时整合增敏(SIB)可以解决这一不足。在一项针对 20 例未切除脑转移瘤的回顾性计划研究中,我们对 SIB 方法进行了测试,并与传统的处方方法进行了比较。
对于所有转移瘤,GTV 等向性扩大 3mm 得到 PTV。生成了两种计划,一种是根据 80%的经典概念,对 80%PTV 周围的等剂量线(D(PTV)≥35Gy)给予 5 次 7Gy 的照射(D);另一种是根据 SIB 概念,对 GTV 给予 5 次 8.5Gy 的平均剂量,同时 D(PTV)≥35Gy 作为附加要求。采用 Wilcoxon 配对符号秩检验,对 GTV 内的均匀性、GTV 周围 PTV 边缘的高剂量以及 PTV 周围的剂量适形性和梯度进行了计划对之间的比较。
SIB 概念在 GTV 内剂量均匀性方面优于经典 80%概念:GTV 的不均匀性指数在 SIB 概念(中位数 0.0513,范围 0.0397-0.0757)显著(p=0.001)低于 80%概念(中位数 0.0894,范围 0.0447-0.1872)。PTV 周围的剂量梯度没有降低。其他检查指标无差异。
我们的立体定向 SIB 概念更好地定义了 PTV 内的剂量分布,可以考虑用于临床应用。