Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3474-3482. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14218. Epub 2023 May 22.
This study was aimed at investigating the effect of sinus removal combined with vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. From January 2019 to May 2022, 62 patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were treated and their information was collected at our hospital. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: an observation group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 30). The control group underwent a simple sinus resection and suture, while the observation group received a sinus resection combined with closed negative pressure drainage of the wound. A retrospective analysis of the data obtained was conducted. Perioperative indicators, clinical efficacy, postoperative pain, complications, aesthetic effects, and satisfaction scores at six months after the operation were compared between the two groups, and the recurrence rate at six months after the operation was recorded. Through this study, we found that the observation group had significantly shorter surgery time, hospital stay, and return time compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group had a higher overall recurrence rate (ORR) of 100.00%, which was significantly better than the control group's ORR of 86.67% (P < 0.05). The visual analog scale (VAS) score at 6, 12, and 24 h after the operation was significantly lower in the observation group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Although the differences were not significant (P > 0.05), the observation group had decreased white blood cell, neutrophil, and C-reactive protein levels after the operation. Moreover, the total occurrence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower (6.25%) than that of the control group (26.67%; P < 0.05). The observation group also had significantly lower scores on the postoperative scar scale and higher satisfaction scores than the control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrence rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Our study demonstrated that sinus resection combined with vacuum-assisted closure was more effective in treating sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus compared with simple sinus resection and suture. This approach significantly reduced surgery time, hospital stay, and return time. It also effectively relieved postoperative pain, reduced the occurrence of postoperative complications, resulted in smaller postoperative scars, and yielded better aesthetic outcomes and higher patient satisfaction.
本研究旨在探讨窦道切除联合负压封闭引流在治疗骶尾部藏毛窦中的作用。2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月,我院收治了 62 例骶尾部藏毛窦患者,并收集了他们的信息。这些患者被随机分为两组:观察组(n=32)和对照组(n=30)。对照组行单纯窦道切除术和缝合,观察组行窦道切除联合伤口闭式负压引流。对两组患者的围手术期指标、临床疗效、术后疼痛、并发症、美学效果和术后 6 个月的满意度评分进行回顾性分析,并记录术后 6 个月的复发率。通过这项研究,我们发现观察组的手术时间、住院时间和恢复时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。此外,观察组的总复发率(ORR)为 100.00%,明显优于对照组的 86.67%(P<0.05)。观察组术后 6、12、24 h 的视觉模拟评分(VAS)明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。虽然差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组术后白细胞、中性粒细胞和 C 反应蛋白水平下降。此外,观察组术后并发症总发生率明显低于对照组(6.25%比 26.67%;P<0.05)。观察组术后瘢痕评分明显低于对照组,满意度评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。然而,两组术后复发率无显著差异(P>0.05)。本研究表明,窦道切除联合负压封闭引流治疗骶尾部藏毛窦比单纯窦道切除和缝合更有效。该方法显著缩短了手术时间、住院时间和恢复时间。它还能有效缓解术后疼痛,减少术后并发症的发生,使术后疤痕更小,并产生更好的美学效果和更高的患者满意度。