Suppr超能文献

骶尾部藏毛窦的部分一期缝合:采用改良缝合技术。

Partial primary closure in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: Modified with suture technique.

作者信息

Yildiz Abdullah

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):381-385. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.029. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

Abstract

AIM AND BACKGROUND

The primary purpose of pilonidal sinus treatment is to minimize complications, accelerate wound healing, and minimize recurrence. However, invasive and minimally invasive methods are being developed to reduce these problems. Early and late postoperative complications remain significant problems in pilonidal surgery. This study aimed to contribute to this issue in surgery by comparing the results of the Karydakis flap (KF) technique and those of the partial primary closure (PPC) technique, to which we applied suture modification.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients diagnosed with pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) were randomly assigned to two groups. Apply the partial primary closure in 46 patients and the Karydakis technique in 50.

RESULTS

In comparison to the Karydakis technique, the partial primary closure (PPC) group's hospitalization stay was shorter, although the difference was not significant. Healing time was also longer in uncomplicated cases (p = 0.200 and 0.064, respectively). Abscesses and hematomas were not observed with partial primary closure, but the total complication rate was similar to that of the Karydakis technique. Surgical site infections were often seen in the PPC group (21.7% vs. 10%). In contrast, healing time for complicated cases was found to be significantly shorter in the PPC technique (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative abscess, hematoma, and seroma are the most common causes of total wound dehiscence, and delay in wound healing in off-midline techniques. We recommend the PPC technique with suture modification as an alternative to off-midline techniques in clean and chronically infected cases, other than cellulitis, abscess, and purulent discharge cases. However, we primarily recommend off-midline techniques in clean or asymptomatic cases.

摘要

目的与背景

藏毛窦治疗的主要目的是将并发症降至最低、加速伤口愈合并减少复发。然而,目前正在开发侵入性和微创方法来解决这些问题。术后早期和晚期并发症仍是藏毛窦手术中的重大问题。本研究旨在通过比较改良缝合的部分一期缝合(PPC)技术和卡里达基斯皮瓣(KF)技术的结果,为该手术领域的这一问题提供参考。

方法

总共96例被诊断为藏毛窦疾病(PSD)的患者被随机分为两组。46例患者采用部分一期缝合,50例采用卡里达基斯技术。

结果

与卡里达基斯技术相比,部分一期缝合(PPC)组的住院时间较短,尽管差异不显著。在无并发症的病例中,愈合时间也较长(分别为p = 0.200和0.064)。部分一期缝合未观察到脓肿和血肿,但总并发症发生率与卡里达基斯技术相似。PPC组经常出现手术部位感染(21.7% 对10%)。相比之下,发现PPC技术在复杂病例中的愈合时间明显更短(p < 0.05)。

结论

术后脓肿、血肿和血清肿是全层伤口裂开以及中线外技术伤口愈合延迟的最常见原因。对于清洁和慢性感染病例(除蜂窝织炎、脓肿和脓性分泌物病例外),我们推荐改良缝合的PPC技术作为中线外技术的替代方法。然而,对于清洁或无症状病例,我们主要推荐中线外技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验