Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
Duke Molecular Physiology Institute Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 6;12(11):e028410. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028410. Epub 2023 May 23.
Background The interplay between branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) metabolism, an important pathway in adiposity and cardiometabolic disease, and visceral adipose depots such as hepatic steatosis (HS) and epicardial adipose tissue is unknown. We leveraged the PROMISE clinical trial with centrally adjudicated coronary computed tomography angiography imaging to determine relationships between adipose depots, BCAA dysregulation, and coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and Results The PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial randomized 10 003 outpatients with stable chest pain to computed tomography angiography versus standard-of-care diagnostics. For this study, we included 1798 participants with available computed tomography angiography data and biospecimens. Linear and logistic regression were used to determine associations between a molar sum of BCAAs measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with body mass index, adipose traits, and obstructive CAD. Mendelian randomization was then used to determine if BCAAs are in the causal pathway for adipose depots or CAD. The study sample had a mean age of 60 years (SD, 8.0), body mass index of 30.6 (SD, 5.9), and epicardial adipose tissue volume of 57.3 (SD, 21.3) cm/m; 27% had HS, and 14% had obstructive CAD. BCAAs were associated with body mass index (multivariable beta 0.12 per SD increase in BCAA [95% CI, 0.08-0.17]; =4×10). BCAAs were also associated with HS (multivariable odds ratio [OR], 1.46 per SD increase in BCAAs [95% CI, 1.28-1.67]; =2×10), but BCAAs were associated only with epicardial adipose tissue volume (odds ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07-1.32]; =0.002) and obstructive CAD (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.04-1.34]; =0.009) in univariable models. Two-sample Mendelian randomization did not support the role of BCAAs as within the causal pathways for HS or CAD. Conclusions BCAAs have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic diseases, and adipose depots have been associated with the risk of CAD. Leveraging a large clinical trial, we further establish the role of dysregulated BCAA catabolism in HS and CAD, although BCAAs did not appear to be in the causal pathway of either disease. This suggests that BCAAs may serve as an independent circulating biomarker of HS and CAD but that their association with these cardiometabolic diseases is mediated through other pathways.
支链氨基酸(BCAA)代谢与肥胖和心脏代谢疾病的重要途径相互作用,以及内脏脂肪组织(如肝脂肪变性[HS]和心外膜脂肪组织)之间的关系尚不清楚。我们利用 PROMISE 临床研究,该研究通过中心裁定的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影成像来确定脂肪沉积、BCAA 失调与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)之间的关系。
PROMISE(前瞻性多中心成像研究评估胸痛)试验将 10003 名稳定胸痛的门诊患者随机分为冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影与标准护理诊断。在这项研究中,我们纳入了 1798 名有可用的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影数据和生物样本的参与者。线性和逻辑回归用于确定通过核磁共振光谱法测量的 BCAAs 摩尔总和与体重指数、脂肪特征和阻塞性 CAD 之间的关联。随后,孟德尔随机化用于确定 BCAA 是否在脂肪沉积或 CAD 的因果途径中。研究样本的平均年龄为 60 岁(标准差为 8.0),体重指数为 30.6(标准差为 5.9),心外膜脂肪组织体积为 57.3(标准差为 21.3)cm/m;27%有 HS,14%有阻塞性 CAD。BCAA 与体重指数相关(多变量β,BCAA 每标准差增加 0.12[95%CI,0.08-0.17];=4×10)。BCAA 也与 HS 相关(多变量比值比[OR],BCAA 每标准差增加 1.46[95%CI,1.28-1.67];=2×10),但 BCAAs 仅与心外膜脂肪组织体积相关(比值比,1.18[95%CI,1.07-1.32];=0.002)和阻塞性 CAD 相关(OR,1.18[95%CI,1.04-1.34];=0.009)。两样本孟德尔随机化不支持 BCAAs 作为 HS 或 CAD 因果途径的作用。
BCAA 已被牵连到心脏代谢疾病的发病机制中,脂肪沉积与 CAD 的风险有关。利用一项大型临床试验,我们进一步确定了失调的 BCAA 分解代谢在 HS 和 CAD 中的作用,尽管 BCAAs 似乎不在这两种疾病的因果途径中。这表明,BCAA 可能作为 HS 和 CAD 的独立循环生物标志物,但它们与这些心脏代谢疾病的关联是通过其他途径介导的。