Horgan C M
Health Serv Res. 1986 Jun;21(2 Pt 2):291-319.
A two-part model is used to examine the demand for ambulatory mental health services in the specialty sector. In the first equation, the probability of having a mental health visit is estimated. In the second part of the model, variations in levels of use expressed in terms of visits and expenditures are examined in turn, with each of these equations conditional on positive utilization of mental health services. In the second part of the model, users are additionally grouped into those with and without out-of-pocket payment for services. This specification accounts for special characteristics regarding the utilization of ambulatory mental health services: (1) a large part of the population does not use these services; (2) of those who use services, the distribution of use is highly skewed; and (3) a large number of users have zero out-of-pocket expenditures. Cost-sharing does indeed matter in the demand for ambulatory mental health services from specialty providers; however, the decision to use mental health services is affected by the level of cost-sharing to a lesser degree than is the decision regarding the level of use of services. The results also show that price is only one of several important factors in determining the demand for services. The lack of significance of family income and of being female is notable. Evidence is presented for the existence of bandwagon effects. The importance of Medicaid in the probability of use equations is noted.
一个两部分模型用于研究专科领域门诊心理健康服务的需求。在第一个方程中,估计进行心理健康就诊的概率。在模型的第二部分,依次考察以就诊次数和支出表示的使用水平的变化,每个方程都以心理健康服务的积极利用为条件。在模型的第二部分,用户还被分为有自付费用和无自付费用两类。这种设定考虑到了门诊心理健康服务利用的特殊特征:(1)很大一部分人口不使用这些服务;(2)在使用服务的人群中,使用分布高度不均衡;(3)大量用户的自付费用为零。成本分担在专科提供者的门诊心理健康服务需求中确实很重要;然而,使用心理健康服务的决定受成本分担水平的影响程度小于使用服务水平的决定。结果还表明,价格只是决定服务需求的几个重要因素之一。家庭收入和女性因素缺乏显著性值得注意。有证据表明存在从众效应。还指出了医疗补助在使用概率方程中的重要性。