Suppr超能文献

专科医疗机构对门诊心理健康服务的需求。

The demand for ambulatory mental health services from specialty providers.

作者信息

Horgan C M

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1986 Jun;21(2 Pt 2):291-319.

Abstract

A two-part model is used to examine the demand for ambulatory mental health services in the specialty sector. In the first equation, the probability of having a mental health visit is estimated. In the second part of the model, variations in levels of use expressed in terms of visits and expenditures are examined in turn, with each of these equations conditional on positive utilization of mental health services. In the second part of the model, users are additionally grouped into those with and without out-of-pocket payment for services. This specification accounts for special characteristics regarding the utilization of ambulatory mental health services: (1) a large part of the population does not use these services; (2) of those who use services, the distribution of use is highly skewed; and (3) a large number of users have zero out-of-pocket expenditures. Cost-sharing does indeed matter in the demand for ambulatory mental health services from specialty providers; however, the decision to use mental health services is affected by the level of cost-sharing to a lesser degree than is the decision regarding the level of use of services. The results also show that price is only one of several important factors in determining the demand for services. The lack of significance of family income and of being female is notable. Evidence is presented for the existence of bandwagon effects. The importance of Medicaid in the probability of use equations is noted.

摘要

一个两部分模型用于研究专科领域门诊心理健康服务的需求。在第一个方程中,估计进行心理健康就诊的概率。在模型的第二部分,依次考察以就诊次数和支出表示的使用水平的变化,每个方程都以心理健康服务的积极利用为条件。在模型的第二部分,用户还被分为有自付费用和无自付费用两类。这种设定考虑到了门诊心理健康服务利用的特殊特征:(1)很大一部分人口不使用这些服务;(2)在使用服务的人群中,使用分布高度不均衡;(3)大量用户的自付费用为零。成本分担在专科提供者的门诊心理健康服务需求中确实很重要;然而,使用心理健康服务的决定受成本分担水平的影响程度小于使用服务水平的决定。结果还表明,价格只是决定服务需求的几个重要因素之一。家庭收入和女性因素缺乏显著性值得注意。有证据表明存在从众效应。还指出了医疗补助在使用概率方程中的重要性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
The impact of copayments on mental healthcare utilization: a natural experiment.
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;19(6):775-784. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0921-7. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
4
China's medical savings accounts: an analysis of the price elasticity of demand for health care.
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;18(6):773-785. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0827-9. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
5
The role of provider supply and organization in reducing racial/ethnic disparities in mental health care in the U.S.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 May;84:102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
6
A political history of federal mental health and addiction insurance parity.
Milbank Q. 2010 Sep;88(3):404-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00605.x.
7
Predictors of Outpatient Mental Health Service Use by American Youth.
Psychol Serv. 2008 Aug 1;5(3):251-261. doi: 10.1037/1541-1559.5.3.251.
10
The costs of mental health services under the Fort Bragg Demonstration.
J Ment Health Adm. 1996 Winter;23(1):92-106. doi: 10.1007/BF02518646.

本文引用的文献

1
Insurance benefits, out-of-pocket payments, and the demand for medical care.
Health Med Care Serv Rev. 1978 Jul-Aug;1(4):1, 3-15.
2
Reductions in insurance for mental disorders: adverse selection, moral hazard, and consumer demand.
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;139(11):1425-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.11.1425.
3
Specialty and general ambulatory mental health services. Comparison of utilization and expenditures.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;42(6):565-72. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790290047005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验