• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合需求侧和供给侧成本分担:住院精神卫生保健的案例

Combining demand- and supply-side cost sharing: the case of inpatient mental health care.

作者信息

McGuire T G

出版信息

Inquiry. 1989 Summer;26(2):292-303.

PMID:2526097
Abstract

Public and private payers can set the terms of demand-side cost sharing in insurance for patients and supply-side cost sharing in the form of reimbursement for providers. This paper summarizes a model in which health care utilization is affected by both demand- and supply-side cost sharing. The combined effects of these two policies are simulated in an application to inpatient mental health care. Because supply-side cost sharing (as would take place in a prospective payment system) limits cost without imposing financial risk on patients, it is preferred as a policy for restraining cost. I show in the case studied that when supply-side cost sharing is introduced, insurance coverage should improve.

摘要

公共和私人支付方可以设定患者保险中需求方成本分担的条款,以及以提供者报销形式的供给方成本分担。本文总结了一个模型,其中医疗保健利用受到需求方和供给方成本分担的影响。在住院精神卫生保健的应用中模拟了这两项政策的综合效果。由于供给方成本分担(如在预期支付系统中那样)在不给患者带来财务风险的情况下限制了成本,因此作为一种成本控制政策更受青睐。我在所研究的案例中表明,当引入供给方成本分担时,保险覆盖范围应该会得到改善。

相似文献

1
Combining demand- and supply-side cost sharing: the case of inpatient mental health care.结合需求侧和供给侧成本分担:住院精神卫生保健的案例
Inquiry. 1989 Summer;26(2):292-303.
2
Supply-side and demand-side cost sharing in deregulated social health insurance: which is more effective?去监管化社会健康保险中的供方和需方成本分担:哪一种更有效?
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):231-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
3
The demand for ambulatory mental health services from specialty providers.专科医疗机构对门诊心理健康服务的需求。
Health Serv Res. 1986 Jun;21(2 Pt 2):291-319.
4
Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.健康保险与医疗需求:来自一项随机试验的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 1987 Jun;77(3):251-77.
5
Demand response of mental health services to cost sharing under managed care.管理式医疗下心理健康服务对成本分担的需求响应。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Sep;11(3):113-25.
6
Financing and demand for mental health services.心理健康服务的融资与需求。
J Hum Resour. 1981 Fall;16(4):501-22.
7
Health care economic factors and the effects of benefits plan design changes.
J Occup Med. 1991 Mar;33(3):279-86.
8
Cost sharing and the use of ambulatory mental health services.成本分摊与门诊心理健康服务的使用
Am Psychol. 1984 Oct;39(10):1077-89.
9
Mental health services in the context of health insurance reform.
Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):349-64.
10
Surviving the perfect storm: impacts of benefit reductions and increased cost sharing in a Medicaid program.在这场完美风暴中幸存:医疗补助计划中福利削减和成本分担增加的影响。
Find Brief. 2008 Jul;11(4):1-4.