Schoenfeld Brad J, Ogborn Dan, Piñero Alec, Burke Ryan, Coleman Max, Rolnick Nicholas
Department of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Apr 27;8(2):51. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8020051.
Emerging evidence indicates that the use of low-load resistance training in combination with blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) can be an effective method to elicit increases in muscle size, with most research showing similar whole muscle development of the extremities compared to high-load (HL) training. It is conceivable that properties unique to LL-BFR such as greater ischemia, reperfusion, and metabolite accumulation may enhance the stress on type I fibers during training compared to the use of LLs without occlusion. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper was to systematically review the relevant literature on the fiber-type-specific response to LL-BFR and provide insights into future directions for research. A total of 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Results of the review suggest that the magnitude of type I fiber hypertrophy is at least as great, and sometimes greater, than type II hypertrophy when performing LL-BFR. This finding is in contrast to HL training, where the magnitude of type II fiber hypertrophy tends to be substantially greater than that of type I myofibers. However, limited data directly compare training with LL-BFR to nonoccluded LL or HL conditions, thus precluding the ability to draw strong inferences as to whether the absolute magnitude of type I hypertrophy is indeed greater in LL-BFR vs. traditional HL training. Moreover, it remains unclear as to whether combining LL-BFR with traditional HL training may enhance whole muscle hypertrophy via greater increases in type I myofiber cross-sectional area.
新出现的证据表明,低负荷抗阻训练结合血流限制(LL-BFR)可能是一种有效增加肌肉量的方法,大多数研究表明,与高负荷(HL)训练相比,四肢的全肌肉发育情况相似。可以想象,LL-BFR特有的特性,如更大程度的缺血、再灌注和代谢物积累,与不进行闭塞的低负荷训练相比,可能会在训练期间增强对I型纤维的压力。因此,本文的目的是系统回顾关于LL-BFR对纤维类型特异性反应的相关文献,并为未来的研究方向提供见解。共有11项研究符合纳入标准。综述结果表明,进行LL-BFR时,I型纤维肥大的程度至少与II型纤维肥大一样大,有时甚至更大。这一发现与HL训练形成对比,在HL训练中,II型纤维肥大的程度往往远大于I型肌纤维。然而,直接比较LL-BFR训练与非闭塞性低负荷或HL训练的数据有限,因此无法就LL-BFR与传统HL训练相比I型纤维肥大的绝对程度是否确实更大得出有力的推论。此外,LL-BFR与传统HL训练相结合是否会通过更大程度地增加I型肌纤维横截面积来增强全肌肉肥大,目前仍不清楚。