Cisneros-Blagg T, Scanlan C L
J Allied Health. 1986 May;15(2):93-106.
Historically, accreditation standards in allied health education have evolved using judgment and tradition as the basis for characterizing a quality program of learning. Recent efforts to address growing concerns over the lack of evidence to support standards perceived as arbitrary, costly, and prescriptive have been largely ineffective in catalyzing major change. Moreover, the fundamental assumption underlying specialized accreditation, that compliance with pre-established standards will favorably affect the outcome of the educational process, has heretofore remained untested. This paper provides a historical perspective on prior efforts to evaluate accreditation requirements and describes the conceptual framework, developmental considerations, application, and potential utility of a model employed to assess the validity of one allied health agency's accreditation standards.
从历史上看,联合健康职业教育的认证标准一直是基于判断和传统来发展的,以此作为界定优质学习项目的基础。近期,针对人们日益担忧缺乏证据支持那些被认为是武断、昂贵且指令性的标准所做的努力,在推动重大变革方面基本没有成效。此外,专业认证所依据的基本假设,即符合预先设定的标准将对教育过程的结果产生有利影响,迄今为止尚未得到检验。本文提供了一个关于以往评估认证要求工作的历史视角,并描述了一个用于评估一家联合健康机构认证标准有效性的模型的概念框架、发展考量、应用及潜在效用。