Suppr超能文献

葡萄牙 COVID-19 大流行期间全科医生的可及性-城市环境下患者体验的调查研究。

Access to General Practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal-A survey study of patient experiences in an urban setting.

机构信息

EPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 May 23;18(5):e0285899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285899. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2020, Portugal had high levels of unmet health care needs. Primary Care was reported as the main source of unmet needs.

OBJECTIVES

To describe face-to-face and remote access to GPs in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. To discover patient experiences and attitudes to access to care. To identify determinants of access to care.

METHODS

A survey of a random sample of 4,286 adults registered in a group of Family Practices was conducted in 2021. Paper questionnaires were sent by post to patients who had no e-mail address registered with the practice. Patients with an e-mail address were sent a link to an online questionnaire. Outcomes were reported waiting times for face-to-face and remote contacts with GPs, dichotomized to ascertain compliance with standards. Associations between participant characteristics and outcome variables were tested using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Waiting times for face-to-face consultations with GPs during the pandemic often exceeded the maximum waiting times (MWT) set by the National Health Service. Remote contacts were mostly conducted within acceptable standards. Waiting times for speaking with the GP over the phone were rated as 'poor' by 40% and 27% reported requests for these calls as unmet. The odds of getting care over MWT increased for participants who reported poorer digital skills. Participants were less likely to get non-urgent consultations over MWT if they found it easy to use the online patient portal to book appointments (odds ratio 0.24; 99% confidence intervals 0.09-0.61), request prescriptions (0.18; 0.04-0.74) or insert personal data (0.18; 0.04-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Patient reported access to GPs during the pandemic was uneven in Portugal. Obtaining non-urgent consultations and remote contacts over MWT affected mainly those patients with poor digital skills. Telephone access to GPs received the worse ratings. Access through traditional pathways must remain available, to prevent the widening of inequities.

摘要

背景

2020 年,葡萄牙有大量未满足的医疗需求。初级保健被报告为未满足需求的主要来源。

目的

描述葡萄牙在 COVID-19 大流行期间面对面和远程获得全科医生服务的情况。了解患者对医疗服务获取的体验和态度。确定获得医疗服务的决定因素。

方法

2021 年对一组家庭实践中随机抽取的 4286 名成年人进行了一项调查。没有在实践中注册电子邮件地址的患者通过邮寄方式收到纸质问卷。有电子邮件地址的患者会收到在线问卷的链接。报告结果为与全科医生进行面对面和远程接触的等待时间,将其分为遵守标准的情况。使用逻辑回归检验参与者特征与结果变量之间的关联。

结果

大流行期间与全科医生进行面对面咨询的等待时间经常超过国家卫生服务机构设定的最大等待时间(MWT)。远程接触大多在可接受的标准内进行。40%的人认为与医生通电话的等待时间“差”,27%的人报告这些电话请求未得到满足。报告数字技能较差的参与者获得超过 MWT 的医疗服务的可能性增加。如果参与者发现使用在线患者门户预约(比值比 0.24;99%置信区间 0.09-0.61)、要求处方(0.18;0.04-0.74)或插入个人数据(0.18;0.04-0.95)更容易,则不太可能获得超过 MWT 的非紧急咨询。

结论

葡萄牙在大流行期间患者报告的获得全科医生服务的情况参差不齐。获得非紧急咨询和超过 MWT 的远程接触主要影响那些数字技能较差的患者。通过传统途径获得的电话服务获得的评价最差。必须保留传统途径,以防止不平等现象扩大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470a/10204959/2a5c8f44437d/pone.0285899.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验