Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
J Headache Pain. 2023 May 24;24(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01590-5.
BACKGROUND: Neuroimaging studies have made an important contribution to our understanding of headache pathophysiology. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview and critical appraisal of mechanisms of actions of headache treatments and potential biomarkers of treatment response disclosed by imaging studies. MAIN BODY: We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases for imaging studies investigating central and vascular effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments used to abort and prevent headache attacks. Sixty-three studies were included in the final qualitative analysis. Of these, 54 investigated migraine patients, 4 cluster headache patients and 5 patients with medication overuse headache. Most studies used functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 33) or molecular imaging (n = 14). Eleven studies employed structural MRI and a few used arterial spin labeling (n = 3), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (n = 3) or magnetic resonance angiography (n = 2). Different imaging modalities were combined in eight studies. Despite of the variety of imaging approaches and results, some findings were consistent. This systematic review suggests that triptans may cross the blood-brain barrier to some extent, though perhaps not sufficiently to alter the intracranial cerebral blood flow. Acupuncture in migraine, neuromodulation in migraine and cluster headache patients, and medication withdrawal in patients with medication overuse headache could promote headache improvement by reverting headache-affected pain processing brain areas. Yet, there is currently no clear evidence for where each treatment acts, and no firm imaging predictors of efficacy. This is mainly due to a scarcity of studies and heterogeneous treatment schemes, study designs, subjects, and imaging techniques. In addition, most studies used small sample sizes and inadequate statistical approaches, which precludes generalizable conclusions. CONCLUSION: Several aspects of headache treatments remain to be elucidated using imaging approaches, such as how pharmacological preventive therapies work, whether treatment-related brain changes may influence therapy effectiveness, and imaging biomarkers of clinical response. In the future, well-designed studies with homogeneous study populations, adequate sample sizes and statistical approaches are needed.
背景:神经影像学研究为我们理解头痛病理生理学做出了重要贡献。本系统综述旨在全面概述和批判性评估头痛治疗的作用机制以及影像学研究揭示的治疗反应潜在生物标志物。
主要内容:我们在 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库中进行了系统文献检索,以查找用于终止和预防头痛发作的药物和非药物治疗的中枢和血管作用的影像学研究。共有 63 项研究纳入最终的定性分析。其中,54 项研究涉及偏头痛患者,4 项研究涉及丛集性头痛患者,5 项研究涉及药物过度使用性头痛患者。大多数研究使用功能磁共振成像(MRI)(n=33)或分子成像(n=14)。11 项研究采用结构 MRI,少数研究采用动脉自旋标记(n=3)、磁共振波谱(n=3)或磁共振血管造影(n=2)。八项研究结合了不同的成像方式。尽管成像方法和结果多种多样,但有些发现是一致的。本系统综述表明,曲普坦类药物可能在一定程度上穿过血脑屏障,尽管可能不足以改变颅内脑血流。偏头痛中的针刺、偏头痛和丛集性头痛患者中的神经调节以及药物过度使用性头痛患者中的药物戒断可能通过逆转受头痛影响的疼痛处理脑区来促进头痛改善。然而,目前尚无明确证据表明每种治疗方法的作用部位,也没有有效的影像学预测指标。这主要是由于研究数量少、治疗方案、研究设计、对象和成像技术存在差异。此外,大多数研究的样本量较小,统计方法不充分,因此无法得出普遍适用的结论。
结论:使用影像学方法仍需阐明头痛治疗的几个方面,例如药物预防性治疗的作用机制、治疗相关的大脑变化是否会影响治疗效果,以及临床反应的影像学生物标志物。未来需要设计良好的研究,具有同质的研究人群、足够的样本量和统计方法。
J Headache Pain. 2023-5-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-4-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-4-12
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2025-5-1
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-16
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023-8-14
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023-2-2
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023-10
Curr Opin Neurol. 2022-6-1