Cancer Knowledge & Information Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, 38-13, Dokjeom-ro 3beon- gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, Republic of Korea.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 23;23(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04008-8.
This study aimed to examine the association of absolute and relative hand grip strength (HGS) with the risk of all-cause mortality among middle-aged and old-aged people in South Korea. Considering that both absolute HGS and relative HGS could be effective measures, an in-depth investigation is necessary to compare the effects of both measures on mortality.
Data of 9,102 participants, derived from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging from 2006 to 2018, were examined. HGS was divided into two categories: absolute HGS and relative HGS (defined as HGS divided by body mass index). The risk of all-cause mortality was the dependent variable. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to analyze the association between HGS and all-cause mortality.
The average of absolute and relative HGS were 25.6 ± 8.7 kg and 1.1 ± 0.4 kg/BMI, respectively. The all-cause mortality rate decreased by 3.2% as absolute HGS increased by 1 kg (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.968, 95% CI = 0.958-0.978). An increase in relative HGS by 1 kg/BMI was associated with a 22% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 0.780, 95% CI = 0.634-0.960). Individuals with more than two chronic diseases, there was a decrease in all-cause mortality as absolute HGS increased by 1 kg and relative HGS by 1 kg/BMI (absolute HGS; adjusted HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.959-0.982, relative HGS; adjusted HR = 0.483, 95% CI = 0.325-0.718).
Our study findings showed that both absolute and relative HGS were inversely associated with the risk of all-cause mortality; a higher absolute/relative HGS was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Moreover, these findings highlight the importance of improving HGS to alleviate the burden of adverse health problems.
本研究旨在探讨韩国中老年人绝对和相对握力与全因死亡率风险的关系。考虑到绝对握力和相对握力均为有效的衡量指标,因此有必要深入研究比较这两种衡量指标对死亡率的影响。
本研究数据来源于 2006 年至 2018 年的韩国老龄化纵向研究,共纳入 9102 名参与者。握力分为两类:绝对握力和相对握力(定义为握力除以体重指数)。全因死亡率为因变量。采用 Cox 比例风险回归分析握力与全因死亡率之间的关系。
绝对握力和相对握力的平均值分别为 25.6±8.7kg 和 1.1±0.4kg/BMI。绝对握力每增加 1kg,全因死亡率降低 3.2%(调整后的危险比[HR]=0.968,95%可信区间[CI]=0.958-0.978)。相对握力每增加 1kg/BMI,全因死亡率的风险降低 22%(调整后的 HR=0.780,95%CI=0.634-0.960)。患有两种以上慢性疾病的个体,随着绝对握力每增加 1kg 和相对握力每增加 1kg/BMI,全因死亡率均降低(绝对握力:调整后的 HR=0.97,95%CI=0.959-0.982;相对握力:调整后的 HR=0.483,95%CI=0.325-0.718)。
本研究结果表明,绝对握力和相对握力均与全因死亡率风险呈负相关;较高的绝对/相对握力与较低的全因死亡率风险相关。此外,这些发现强调了提高握力以减轻不良健康问题负担的重要性。