College of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 23;23(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03035-6.
This study aims to evaluate three types of manual toothbrushes [Cross action (CA), Flat trim (FT), and orthodontic type (OT)] in terms of efficacy in plaque removal in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment.
Manual toothbrushes are an essential part of oral hygiene for primary prevention. Plaque control, however, can be influenced by a number of individual and material-related factors. Individual factors include the presence of fixed orthodontic appliances on tooth surfaces, such as brackets and bands, which create difficulties with oral hygiene and lead to plaque formation. The evidence for the effectiveness of advanced bristle designs (multilevel, criss-cross) of the manual toothbrush alone in removing plaque in patients undergoing orthodontic therapy is limited.
The experiment followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. This was a three treatment, three-period crossover clinical trial with a single brushing exercise. Thirty subjects were randomized to one of the three treatment sequences of different bristle designs: (CA, FT, and OT). The primary outcome measure was the difference in the plaque scores (baseline minus post-brushing) at each study period, as determined by the Turesky-Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index.
Of the thirty-four subjects enrolled in the study, thirty of the subjects met the inclusion criteria and completed all three periods of the study. The mean age was 19.5 ± 1.52 years, with a range of 18-23 years. The differences between treatments in plaque score reduction after brushing were statistically significant (p-value < .001). The treatment differences were statistically significant (p-value < .001) favoring the FT toothbrush over the OT and CA types of toothbrush designs. On the contrary, the difference between the OT and CA types was not statistically significant.
Plaque was significantly removed by the conventional FT toothbrush after a single brushing compared to the OT and CA types.
本研究旨在评估三种手动牙刷[十字形(CA)、扁平修剪(FT)和正畸型(OT)]在固定正畸治疗患者中清除牙菌斑的效果。
手动牙刷是初级预防口腔卫生的重要组成部分。然而,菌斑控制可能会受到许多个体和材料相关因素的影响。个体因素包括固定正畸器械在牙齿表面的存在,如托槽和带环,这会给口腔卫生带来困难,并导致菌斑形成。单独使用具有先进刷毛设计(多级、交叉)的手动牙刷在去除正畸治疗患者牙菌斑方面的有效性证据有限。
该实验遵循了《CONSORT 报告标准》(CONSORT)指南。这是一项三处理、三周期交叉临床试验,单次刷牙。30 名受试者被随机分配到三种不同刷毛设计的治疗序列之一:(CA、FT 和 OT)。主要观察指标是每个研究期的菌斑评分差异(基线减去刷牙后),采用 Turesky 改良 Quigley-Hein 菌斑指数测定。
在纳入研究的 34 名受试者中,有 30 名受试者符合纳入标准并完成了所有三个研究期。受试者的平均年龄为 19.5±1.52 岁,范围为 18-23 岁。刷牙后菌斑评分降低的治疗差异具有统计学意义(p 值<0.001)。不同处理方式的差异具有统计学意义(p 值<0.001),FT 牙刷比 OT 和 CA 牙刷设计更有利于减少菌斑。相反,OT 和 CA 类型之间的差异没有统计学意义。
与 OT 和 CA 类型相比,FT 常规牙刷在单次刷牙后能显著去除牙菌斑。