Oosterholt Sean, Pavord Ian D, Brusselle Guy, Yorgancıoğlu Arzu, Pitrez Paulo M, Pg Abhijith, Teli Chirag, Della Pasqua Oscar
Clinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, GSK, London, UK.
Respiratory Medicine Unit and NIHR Respiratory BRC, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Nov;89(11):3273-3290. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15801. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
There is limited understanding of how clinical and demographic characteristics are associated with exacerbation risk in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, and how these factors correlate with symptom control and treatment response. Here we assess the relationship between baseline characteristics and exacerbation risk during regular dosing with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) monotherapy or in combination with long-acting beta2-agonists (ICS/LABA) in clinical trial patients with varying levels of symptom control, as assessed by the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5).
A time-to-event model was developed using pooled patient data (N = 16 282) from nine clinical studies [Correction added on 26 July 2023, after first online publication: The N value in the preceding sentence has been corrected in this version.]. A parametric hazard function was used to describe the time-to-first exacerbation. Covariate analysis included the assessment of the effect of seasonal variation, clinical and demographic baseline characteristics on baseline hazard. Predictive performance was evaluated by standard graphical and statistical methods.
An exponential hazard model best described the time-to-first exacerbation in moderate-to-severe asthma patients. Body mass index, smoking status, sex, ACQ-5, % predicted forced expiratory volume over 1 s (FEV p) and season were identified as statistically significant covariates affecting baseline hazard irrespective of ICS or ICS/LABA use. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the baseline hazard (30.8%) relative to FP monotherapy.
Interindividual differences at baseline and seasonal variation affect the exacerbation risk independently from drug treatment. Moreover, it appears that even when a comparable level of symptom control is achieved in a group of patients, each individual may have a different exacerbation risk, depending on their baseline characteristics and time of the year. These findings highlight the importance of personalized interventions in moderate-to-severe asthma patients.
对于中度至重度哮喘患者的临床和人口统计学特征如何与急性加重风险相关联,以及这些因素如何与症状控制和治疗反应相关联,目前了解有限。在此,我们评估了在临床试验中,通过哮喘控制问卷(ACQ-5)评估的不同症状控制水平的患者,在接受吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)单药治疗或与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用(ICS/LABA)进行常规给药期间,基线特征与急性加重风险之间的关系。
使用来自9项临床研究的汇总患者数据(N = 16282)建立了一个事件发生时间模型[2023年7月26日首次在线发表后添加的更正:此版本中前一句的N值已更正。]。使用参数化风险函数来描述首次急性加重的时间。协变量分析包括评估季节变化、临床和人口统计学基线特征对基线风险的影响。通过标准的图形和统计方法评估预测性能。
指数风险模型最能描述中度至重度哮喘患者首次急性加重的时间。无论使用ICS还是ICS/LABA,体重指数、吸烟状况、性别、ACQ-5、1秒用力呼气容积预测值百分比(FEV p)和季节均被确定为影响基线风险的统计学显著协变量。丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(FP/SAL)联合治疗相对于FP单药治疗,使基线风险显著降低(30.8%)。
基线时的个体差异和季节变化独立于药物治疗影响急性加重风险。此外,似乎即使一组患者实现了相当水平的症状控制,每个个体的急性加重风险可能因基线特征和一年中的时间而异。这些发现突出了中度至重度哮喘患者个性化干预的重要性。