Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, One S. Park St., Floor 7, Madison, WI, 53715, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Nov;315(9):2683-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02642-1. Epub 2023 May 24.
In 2022, National Comprehensive Cancer Network updated the phrase of "complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA)" to "peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA)," which was meant to create more consistency across all treatment modalities and provide clarity to the meaning of total margin evaluation. The aim of this project was to investigate the interpretation of PDEMA across pertinent specialties and to identify any existing knowledge gaps in hopes of improving clinical performance of institutional practice. An electronic survey was administered to medical professionals within the divisions of dermatology and otolaryngology retrieving demographic data and assessing respondents' knowledge on tissue processing techniques and PDEMA. Of the four knowledge-based assessment questions administered, dermatology respondents answered three questions with > 80% accuracy and one question with < 65% accuracy. Otolaryngology respondents answered one question with > 80% accuracy and three with < 65% accuracy. Both groups answered the knowledge-based question evaluating the concept of "what must be true for Mohs or PDEMA to have value" with under 65% accuracy. When comparing dermatology and otolaryngology respondents, only one question which evaluated the proper methods to "achieve processing of the epidermal edge and the base of the tumor along a single plane in the lab" significantly differed between groups, with a percentage correct of 96% for dermatologists compared to 54% for otolaryngologists (p < 0.001). Results were found to be similar when resident physicians were removed from analysis. The overall percent correct for knowledge-based questions was shifted higher for dermatologists compared to otolaryngologists (p = 0.014). This trend was also redemonstrated when analyzing the data excluding residents (p = 0.053).
2022 年,美国国家综合癌症网络将“完整的环周外周和深层切缘评估(CCPDMA)”一词更新为“外周和深层全面切缘评估(PDEMA)”,旨在使所有治疗方式更加一致,并阐明总切缘评估的含义。本项目旨在调查跨相关专业对 PDEMA 的解读,并确定任何现有的知识差距,以期提高机构实践的临床性能。向皮肤科和耳鼻喉科的医疗专业人员发送了一份电子调查,收集人口统计学数据,并评估受访者对组织处理技术和 PDEMA 的了解。在进行的四项基于知识的评估问题中,皮肤科受访者答对了三个问题,准确率超过 80%,答错了一个问题,准确率低于 65%。耳鼻喉科受访者答对了一个问题,准确率超过 80%,答错了三个问题,准确率低于 65%。两组受访者对评估“Mohs 或 PDEMA 必须具有价值的概念”的知识问题的回答准确率均低于 65%。在比较皮肤科和耳鼻喉科的受访者时,只有一个问题评估了“在实验室中沿着单个平面实现表皮边缘和肿瘤基底的处理”的正确方法,皮肤科医生的正确答案率为 96%,而耳鼻喉科医生的正确答案率为 54%,两组间存在显著差异(p<0.001)。当从分析中排除住院医师时,结果相似。皮肤科医生的知识问题的总正确百分比高于耳鼻喉科医生(p=0.014)。当分析排除住院医师的数据时,也出现了这种趋势(p=0.053)。