Suppr超能文献

精神病学治疗关系中的认知不公正。

Epistemic injustice in the therapeutic relationship in psychiatry.

作者信息

Sakakibara Eisuke

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychiatry, the University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Oct;44(5):477-502. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09627-1. Epub 2023 May 24.

Abstract

The notion of epistemic injustice was first applied to cases of discrimination against women and people of color but has since come to refer to wider issues related to social justice. This paper applies the concept of epistemic injustice to problems in the therapeutic relationship between psychiatrists and psychiatric patients. To this end, it is necessary to acknowledge psychiatrists as professionals with expertise in treating mental disorders, which impair the patient's rationality, sometimes leading to false beliefs, such as delusions. This paper classifies the characteristic features of the therapeutic relationship in psychiatry into three stages: those of a professional-client relationship, those of a doctor-patient relationship, and those of a psychiatrist-psychiatric patient relationship. Epistemic injustice is prevalent in psychiatric care owing to prejudice against patients with mental disorders. However, it is also predisposed by the roles that psychiatrists play in relation to psychiatric patients. This paper suggests some ameliorative measures based on the analysis.

摘要

认知不公正的概念最初应用于对女性和有色人种的歧视案例,但此后已扩展到与社会正义相关的更广泛问题。本文将认知不公正的概念应用于精神科医生与精神科患者治疗关系中的问题。为此,有必要承认精神科医生是治疗精神障碍的专业人员,精神障碍会损害患者的理性,有时会导致错误信念,如妄想。本文将精神病学治疗关系的特征分为三个阶段:专业客户关系阶段、医患关系阶段和精神科医生与精神科患者关系阶段。由于对精神障碍患者的偏见,认知不公正在精神科护理中普遍存在。然而,精神科医生在与精神科患者关系中所扮演的角色也会引发认知不公正。本文在分析的基础上提出了一些改善措施。

相似文献

1
Epistemic injustice in the therapeutic relationship in psychiatry.精神病学治疗关系中的认知不公正。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Oct;44(5):477-502. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09627-1. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Epistemic injustice and the psychiatrist.认知不公正与精神科医生
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):1-5. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003804. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
Epistemic injustice in assessment of delusions.妄想评估中的认知不公正。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):479-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12347. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Contributory injustice in psychiatry.精神病学中的贡献性不公正。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Feb;45(2):97-100. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104761. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Epistemic injustice in psychiatry.精神病学中的认知不公正。
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Apr;41(2):65-70. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.050682.
6
Epistemic injustice in assessment of delusions.妄想评估中的认知不公正。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):479-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12347. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
Medicalization and epistemic injustice.医学化与认知不公。
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Aug;18(3):341-52. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9608-3.
9
Social determinants of mental health.心理健康的社会决定因素。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;26(4):392-407. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.928270.
10
Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophial analysis.医疗保健中的认知不公正:哲学分析
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Nov;17(4):529-40. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9560-2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验