Suppr超能文献

背内侧前额叶间歇性θ波爆发刺激治疗抑郁症时的盲法完整性

Blinding integrity of dorsomedial prefrontal intermittent theta burst stimulation in depression.

作者信息

Bengtsson Johan, Frick Andreas, Gingnell Malin

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Entrance 10, 3rd Floor, Uppsala 75185, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Oct-Dec;23(4):100390. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100390. Epub 2023 May 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The antidepressant effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is partly placebo, making blinding integrity important. Blinding of high-frequency rTMS and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has been reported as successful at study end. However, blinding integrity at study start is rarely reported. The aim of this study was to investigate blinding integrity during a treatment course of iTBS over the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) in depression.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients with depression from a double-blind-designed randomized controlled trial (NCT02905604) were included. Patients received either active or sham iTBS over the DMPFC with a placebo coil. The sham group received iTBS-synchronized transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

RESULTS

After one session, 74% of participants were able to correctly guess their treatment allocation. This was above chance level (p = 0.001). The percentage dropped to 64% and 56% after the fifth and last sessions. Belonging to the active group influenced the choice to guess "active" (odds ratio: 11.7, 95% CI 2.5-53.7). A higher treatment intensity of the sham treatment increased the probability to guess "active", but pain did not influence the choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Blinding integrity in iTBS trials must be investigated at study start to avoid uncontrolled confounding. Better sham methods are needed.

摘要

背景

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的抗抑郁作用部分是安慰剂效应,因此盲法的完整性很重要。高频rTMS和间歇性theta爆发刺激(iTBS)在研究结束时的盲法已被报道成功。然而,很少有研究报告研究开始时的盲法完整性。本研究的目的是调查在抑郁症患者背内侧前额叶皮质(DMPFC)进行iTBS治疗过程中的盲法完整性。

方法

纳入了一项双盲设计的随机对照试验(NCT02905604)中的49名抑郁症患者。患者通过安慰剂线圈接受DMPFC上的活性或假性iTBS。假手术组接受iTBS同步经皮神经电刺激。

结果

在一次治疗后,74%的参与者能够正确猜出他们的治疗分配。这高于随机水平(p = 0.001)。在第五次和最后一次治疗后,这一比例分别降至64%和56%。属于活性组影响了猜测“活性”的选择(优势比:11.7,95%可信区间2.5-53.7)。假手术治疗强度越高,猜测“活性”的可能性越大,但疼痛不影响选择。

结论

iTBS试验中的盲法完整性必须在研究开始时进行调查,以避免不受控制的混杂因素。需要更好的假手术方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9fb/10200834/c1b96cface33/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Blinding integrity of dorsomedial prefrontal intermittent theta burst stimulation in depression.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Oct-Dec;23(4):100390. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100390. Epub 2023 May 12.

本文引用的文献

2
The Role of Expectation and Beliefs on the Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 18;11(11):1526. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111526.
3
Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;179(2):132-141. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
Is the response to rTMS largely the result of non-specific effects?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 May;55(5):445-450. doi: 10.1177/00048674211016043.
6
Profiling rTMS: A critical response.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;55(4):355-365. doi: 10.1177/00048674211006192.
9
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018).
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
10
Excess Significance Bias in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Literature for Neuropsychiatric Disorders.
Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(6):363-370. doi: 10.1159/000502805. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验