• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背内侧前额叶皮质重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:10赫兹与间歇性theta爆发刺激的安全性、耐受性、有效性及结果预测因素

rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.

作者信息

Bakker Nathan, Shahab Saba, Giacobbe Peter, Blumberger Daniel M, Daskalakis Zafiris J, Kennedy Sidney H, Downar Jonathan

机构信息

MRI-Guided rTMS Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Room 7M-415, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle, Room 2374, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8.

MRI-Guided rTMS Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Room 7M-415, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8; Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G3.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

DOI:
10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.002
PMID:25465290
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventional rTMS protocols for major depression commonly employ stimulation sessions lasting >30 min. However, recent studies have sought to improve costs, capacities, and outcomes by employing briefer protocols such as theta burst stimulation (iTBS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare safety, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for DMPFC-rTMS with 10 Hz (30 min) versus iTBS (6 min) protocols, in a large, naturalistic, retrospective case series.

METHODS

A chart review identified 185 patients with a medication-resistant major depressive episode who underwent 20-30 sessions of DMPFC-rTMS (10 Hz, n = 98; iTBS, n = 87) at a single Canadian clinic from 2011 to 2014.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of 10 Hz and iTBS patients did not differ prior to treatment, aside from significantly higher age in iTBS patients. A total 7912 runs of DMPFC-rTMS (10 Hz, 4274; iTBS, 3638) were administered, without any seizures or other serious adverse events, and no significant differences in rates of premature discontinuation between groups. Dichotomous outcomes did not differ significantly between groups (Response/remission rates: Beck Depression Inventory-II: 10 Hz, 40.6%/29.2%; iTBS, 43.0%/31.0%. 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: 10 Hz, 50.6%/38.5%; iTBS, 48.5%/27.9%). On continuous outcomes, there was no significant difference between groups in pre-treatment or post-treatment scores, or percent improvement on either measure. Mixed-effects modeling revealed no significant group-by-time interaction on either measure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 10 Hz and iTBS DMPFC-rTMS appear safe and tolerable at 120% resting motor threshold. The effectiveness of 6 min iTBS and 30 min 10 Hz protocols appears comparable. Randomized trials comparing 10 Hz to iTBS may be warranted.

摘要

背景

用于重度抑郁症的传统重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)方案通常采用持续时间超过30分钟的刺激疗程。然而,最近的研究试图通过采用更简短的方案,如theta爆发刺激(iTBS),来提高成本、治疗能力和治疗效果。

目的

在一个大型、自然主义的回顾性病例系列中,比较10赫兹(30分钟)与iTBS(6分钟)方案的背内侧前额叶皮质rTMS的安全性、有效性和疗效预测因素。

方法

通过病历回顾,确定了185例患有难治性重度抑郁发作的患者,他们于2011年至2014年在加拿大一家诊所接受了20 - 30次背内侧前额叶皮质rTMS治疗(10赫兹,n = 98;iTBS,n = 87)。

结果

10赫兹组和iTBS组患者在治疗前的临床特征无差异,只是iTBS组患者年龄显著更高。共进行了7912次背内侧前额叶皮质rTMS治疗(10赫兹,4274次;iTBS,3638次),未发生任何癫痫发作或其他严重不良事件,两组间提前终止治疗的发生率也无显著差异。两组间二分法结局无显著差异(反应/缓解率:贝克抑郁量表第二版:10赫兹组,40.6%/29.2%;iTBS组,43.0%/31.0%。17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表:10赫兹组,50.6%/38.5%;iTBS组,48.5%/27.9%)。在连续结局方面,两组在治疗前或治疗后的评分,或任何一项指标的改善百分比上均无显著差异。混合效应模型显示,两组在任何一项指标上均无显著的组×时间交互作用。

结论

10赫兹和iTBS的背内侧前额叶皮质rTMS在静息运动阈值的120%时似乎都是安全且可耐受的。6分钟iTBS方案和30分钟10赫兹方案的有效性似乎相当。比较10赫兹与iTBS的随机试验可能是有必要的。

相似文献

1
rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.背内侧前额叶皮质重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:10赫兹与间歇性theta爆发刺激的安全性、耐受性、有效性及结果预测因素
Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
2
Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial.theta 爆发刺激与高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的疗效比较(THREE-D):一项随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1683-1692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30295-2. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
Efficacy of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) and 10-Hz high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.间歇性theta波爆发刺激(iTBS)和10赫兹高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗难治性单相抑郁症的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jan 13;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1764-8.
4
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) versus 10 Hz high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to alleviate treatment-resistant unipolar depression: A randomized controlled trial (THETA-DEP).经颅磁刺激治疗难治性单相抑郁的随机对照试验(THETA-DEP):间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(iTBS)与 10 Hz 高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的比较。
Brain Stimul. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):870-880. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 21.
5
Number of pulses or number of sessions? An open-label study of trajectories of improvement for once-vs. twice-daily dorsomedial prefrontal rTMS in major depression.脉冲数或疗程数?单次与每日两次重复经颅磁刺激治疗重性抑郁的改善轨迹的开放性研究。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):327-336. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
Similar Outcomes in Treating Major Depressive Disorder With 10 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Versus Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS): A Naturalistic Observational Study.10Hz 重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)与间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(iTBS)治疗重度抑郁症的疗效相当:一项自然观察研究。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2022 Mar 3;28(2):98-107. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000611.
7
Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis.经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症中采用间歇性 theta 爆发刺激与常规重复经颅磁刺激的比较:成本分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222546. eCollection 2019.
8
Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation treatment in medication-resistant major depression: A fast road to remission?加速间歇性θ波爆发刺激治疗难治性重度抑郁症:通往缓解的快速通道?
J Affect Disord. 2016 Aug;200:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Trajectories of Response to Dorsolateral Prefrontal rTMS in Major Depression: A THREE-D Study.《重性抑郁障碍患者背外侧前额叶 rTMS 反应轨迹:一项 THREE-D 研究》。
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;176(5):367-375. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18091096. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
10
Effect of antipsychotic pharmacotherapy on clinical outcomes of intermittent theta-burst stimulation for refractory depression.抗精神病药物治疗对间歇性θ波爆发刺激难治性抑郁症临床疗效的影响。
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Mar;31(3):312-319. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675516. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for late-life depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.重复经颅磁刺激治疗老年期抑郁症:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Jul;53(7):3000605251359613. doi: 10.1177/03000605251359613. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.重复经颅磁刺激在创伤性脑损伤中的应用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Neurol Int. 2025 May 9;16:175. doi: 10.25259/SNI_926_2024. eCollection 2025.
3
Cognitive Dysfunction in the Addictions (CDiA): protocol for a neuron-to-neighbourhood collaborative research program.
成瘾中的认知功能障碍(CDiA):一项从神经元到社区的合作研究计划方案
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 19;16:1455968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1455968. eCollection 2025.
4
A Single Session of tDCS Stimulation Can Modulate an EEG Microstate Associated With Anxiety in Patients With Depression.单次经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可调节抑郁症患者中与焦虑相关的脑电图微状态。
Brain Behav. 2025 May;15(5):e70580. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70580.
5
Alterations in gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate neurotransmission linked to intermittent theta-burst stimulation in depression: a sham-controlled study.与抑郁症中间歇性theta爆发刺激相关的γ-氨基丁酸和谷氨酸神经传递改变:一项假刺激对照研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 8;15(1):133. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03371-x.
6
The effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on resting-state brain entropy (BEN).间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)对静息态脑熵(BEN)的影响。
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Apr;22(3):e00556. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00556. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
7
Intermittent theta burst stimulation for negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trail.间歇性theta爆发刺激治疗轻度认知障碍精神分裂症患者的阴性症状:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 3;15:1500113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1500113. eCollection 2024.
8
Impact of rTMS and iTBS on Cerebral Hemodynamics and Swallowing in Unilateral Stroke: Insights from fNIRS.重复经颅磁刺激和间歇性θ波爆发刺激对单侧卒中患者脑血流动力学及吞咽功能的影响:基于功能近红外光谱技术的见解
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jan 10;31:e944521. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944521.
9
Mechanisms underlying the spontaneous reorganization of depression network after stroke.中风后抑郁网络自发重组的潜在机制。
Neuroimage Clin. 2025;45:103723. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103723. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
10
Effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation on depressive symptoms targeting prefrontal cortex in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis.功能磁共振成像研究中针对前额叶皮质的非侵入性脑刺激对抑郁症状的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析的联合研究
Psychoradiology. 2024 Nov 5;4:kkae025. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkae025. eCollection 2024.