Sankar Ksheerabdhi, Anand Kuppusamy, Ramani Swetha, Gayathri Balasubramaniam
Department of Anesthesiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Potheri, 603203, India.
Local Reg Anesth. 2023 May 18;16:41-49. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S410510. eCollection 2023.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under epidural anesthesia has been reported to have few advantages over general anesthesia, like lower postoperative pain and less need for analgesics. There are limited studies on PCNL being performed under neuraxial anesthesia in supine position. Hence the present study was conceived to compare hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the supine position under combined spinal-epidural with general anesthesia (GA).
A prospective, randomized control trial was conducted among 90 patients who were posted to undergo elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the the supine position, after obtaining Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) approval and CTRI (Clinical Trial Registry - India) registration. Patients were randomly allotted to undergo surgery either under general anesthesia (group GA) or combined spinal epidural anesthesia (group CSE) by computer-generated random number method. Hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesic requirement and incidence of blood transfusion were recorded and analyzed.
There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to gender, ASA grade, surgery duration, calculus size and pulse rate. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure from 5 to 50 minutes of surgery and less incidence of blood transfusion in patients in the CSE group. Patients who underwent PCNL in the supine position under CSE required lesser analgesics postoperatively compared to those under general anesthesia.
Combined spinal epidural analgesia can be used as an alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing PCNL in the supine position in view of less MAP and reduced postoperative analgesic and blood transfusion requirement.
据报道,硬膜外麻醉下经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)相对于全身麻醉具有一些优势,如术后疼痛较轻且对镇痛药的需求较少。关于在仰卧位经轴索麻醉下进行PCNL的研究有限。因此,本研究旨在比较在联合蛛网膜下腔-硬膜外麻醉与全身麻醉(GA)下仰卧位接受经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)患者的血流动力学参数。
在获得机构伦理委员会(IEC)批准和CTRI(印度临床试验注册中心)注册后,对90例计划在仰卧位接受择期经皮肾镜取石术的患者进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。通过计算机生成随机数法将患者随机分配接受全身麻醉(GA组)或联合蛛网膜下腔硬膜外麻醉(CSE组)下的手术。记录并分析血流动力学参数、术后镇痛需求和输血发生率。
两组在性别、ASA分级、手术持续时间、结石大小和脉搏率方面无显著差异。CSE组患者在手术5至50分钟时平均动脉压有统计学意义的降低,且输血发生率较低。与全身麻醉下的患者相比,CSE下仰卧位接受PCNL的患者术后所需镇痛药较少。
鉴于较低的平均动脉压以及术后镇痛和输血需求的减少,联合蛛网膜下腔硬膜外镇痛可作为仰卧位接受PCNL患者全身麻醉的替代方法。