Brown Nashira I, Stewart Lauren, Rogers Laura Q, Anne Powell Mary, Hardy Claudia M, Baskin Monica L, Oster Robert A, Pisu Maria, Demark-Wahnefried Wendy, Pekmezi Dori
Department of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Department of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Apr 28;33:102223. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102223. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Disparities in physical activity (PA) exist in rural regions and prior research suggests environmental features and community resources likely contribute. It is important to identify the opportunities and barriers that influence activity to appropriately inform PA interventions in such areas. Thus, we assessed the built environment, programs and policies related to PA opportunity in six rural Alabama counties that were purposively selected to inform a PA randomized controlled trial. Assessments were conducted August 2020-May 2021 using the Rural Active Living Assessment. Town characteristics and recreational amenities were captured using the Town Wide Assessment (TWA). PA programs and policies were examined with the Program and Policy Assessment. Walkability was evaluated using the Street Segment Assessment (SSA). Using the scoring system (0-100), the overall TWA score was 49.67 (range: 22-73), indicating few schools within walking distance (≤5 miles of the town's center) and town-wide amenities (e.g., trails, water/recreational activities) for PA. The Program and Policy Assessment showed a paucity of programming and guidelines to support activity (overall average score of 24.67, [range: 22-73]). Only one county had a policy requiring walkways/bikeways in new public infrastructure projects. During assessment of 96 street segments, few pedestrian-friendly safety features [sidewalks (32%), crosswalks (19%), crossing signals (2%), and public lighting (21%)] were observed. Limited opportunities for PA (parks and playgrounds) were identified. Barriers such as few policies and safety features (crossing signals, speed bumps) were indicated as factors that should be addressed when developing PA interventions and informing future policy efforts.
农村地区存在身体活动(PA)方面的差异,先前的研究表明环境特征和社区资源可能是造成这种差异的原因。识别影响身体活动的机会和障碍,对于在此类地区合理开展身体活动干预措施至关重要。因此,我们评估了阿拉巴马州六个农村县与身体活动机会相关的建筑环境、项目和政策,这些县是经过有目的选择的,以便为一项身体活动随机对照试验提供信息。评估于2020年8月至2021年5月期间使用农村积极生活评估工具进行。使用全镇评估(TWA)来获取城镇特征和娱乐设施信息。通过项目和政策评估来审查身体活动项目和政策。使用街道段评估(SSA)来评估步行适宜性。根据评分系统(0 - 100),全镇评估的总体得分是49.67(范围:22 - 73),这表明在步行距离内(距镇中心≤5英里)几乎没有学校,且全镇范围内缺乏用于身体活动的设施(如步道、水上/娱乐活动设施)。项目和政策评估显示,支持身体活动的项目和指导方针很少(总体平均得分24.67,[范围:22 - 73])。只有一个县有政策要求在新的公共基础设施项目中设置人行道/自行车道。在对96个街道段的评估中,观察到很少有对行人友好的安全设施[人行道(32%)、人行横道(19%)、交叉路口信号(2%)和公共照明(21%)]。已确定用于身体活动的机会有限(公园和游乐场)。诸如政策和安全设施(交叉路口信号、减速带)较少等障碍被指出是在制定身体活动干预措施和为未来政策努力提供信息时应解决的因素。