• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过社区联盟提高阿拉巴马州农村地区的身体活动和户外娱乐水平。

Improving Physical Activity and Outdoor Recreation in Rural Alabama Through Community Coalitions.

机构信息

Alabama Cooperative Extension System, Auburn University, Mail: 2121, Rev. Abraham Woods Jr Blvd, Ste 1700, Birmingham, AL 35203. Email:

School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Aug 29;16:E116. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190062.

DOI:10.5888/pcd16.190062
PMID:31469071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6716410/
Abstract

Obesity rates in the United States are trending upward, and disadvantaged populations continue to have disproportionate rates of obesity. In Alabama, the ALProHealth initiative used community-based participatory research to work with community coalitions to implement research-based interventions that addressed issues related to the lack of opportunities for physical activity in 14 counties whose populations are at high risk of obesity. Coalitions developed work plans and timelines for implementing interventions on the basis of issues discussed during focus groups at the beginning of the ALProHealth initiative. These 14 coalitions implemented 101 interventions related to physical activity in 16 communities. In this evaluation, we measured potential reach and improvements in amenities. The largest reach for an intervention was achieved through marketing and communication efforts, while the most popular intervention, undertaken by the largest number of communities, centered on installing or repairing playground equipment at community parks. Community-based participatory research is an effective method for addressing health issues at the local level, as interventions are developed and readily adopted through active partnerships with community leaders and residents.

摘要

美国的肥胖率呈上升趋势,弱势群体的肥胖率仍然不成比例。在阿拉巴马州,ALProHealth 计划利用基于社区的参与式研究与社区联盟合作,实施基于研究的干预措施,解决 14 个县缺乏体育活动机会的问题,这些县的人口肥胖风险很高。联盟根据 ALProHealth 计划开始时焦点小组讨论的问题制定了工作计划和时间表,以实施干预措施。这 14 个联盟在 16 个社区实施了 101 项与体育活动相关的干预措施。在这项评估中,我们衡量了潜在的覆盖范围和设施的改善。干预措施的最大覆盖范围是通过营销和沟通努力实现的,而最受欢迎的干预措施是由最多的社区开展的,主要集中在社区公园安装或修复游乐设备上。基于社区的参与式研究是解决地方一级健康问题的有效方法,因为通过与社区领导和居民的积极合作,干预措施得以制定并迅速得到采纳。

相似文献

1
Improving Physical Activity and Outdoor Recreation in Rural Alabama Through Community Coalitions.通过社区联盟提高阿拉巴马州农村地区的身体活动和户外娱乐水平。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Aug 29;16:E116. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190062.
2
Facilitating Nutrition and Physical Activity-Focused Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change in Rural Areas: A Methodological Approach Using Community Wellness Coalitions and Cooperative Extension.促进农村地区营养和身体活动为重点的政策、系统和环境变化:利用社区健康联盟和合作推广的方法
Health Promot Pract. 2023 May;24(1_suppl):68S-79S. doi: 10.1177/15248399221144976.
3
Implementing Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change Through Community Coalitions and Extension Partnerships to Address Obesity in Rural Louisiana.通过社区联盟和推广伙伴关系实施政策、系统和环境变革,以解决路易斯安那州农村地区的肥胖问题。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Feb 27;17:E18. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190284.
4
Community-Engaged Attribute Mapping: Exploring Resources and Readiness to Change the Rural Context for Obesity Prevention.社区参与属性映射:探索改变农村肥胖预防环境的资源和准备情况。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(2):183-196. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0023.
5
A Participatory Regional Partnership Approach to Promote Nutrition and Physical Activity Through Environmental and Policy Change in Rural Missouri.一种通过密苏里州农村地区的环境与政策变革促进营养与身体活动的参与式区域伙伴关系方法。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 11;12:E92. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140593.
6
Community Coalitions for Change and the Policy, Systems, and Environment Model: A Community-Based Participatory Approach to Addressing Obesity in Rural Tennessee.社区联盟变革与政策、系统和环境模型:以社区为基础的参与式方法解决田纳西州农村地区肥胖问题。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Sep 5;16:E120. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180678.
7
Photovoice engages rural youth in childhood obesity prevention.摄影图片法促使农村青少年参与儿童肥胖预防。
Public Health Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;28(2):186-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00895.x. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
8
Rural Oregon community perspectives: introducing community-based participatory research into a community health coalition.俄勒冈州农村社区的观点:将基于社区的参与性研究引入社区健康联盟。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Fall;7(3):313-22. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0032.
9
Examining Key Stakeholder and Community Residents' Understanding of Environmental Influences to Inform Place-Based Interventions to Reduce Obesity in Rural Communities, Kentucky 2015.检查关键利益相关者和社区居民对环境影响的理解,以为农村社区的基于地点的干预措施提供信息,以减少肥胖,肯塔基州,2015 年。
J Rural Health. 2018 Sep;34(4):388-395. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12254. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
Communities Creating Healthy Environments: improving access to healthy foods and safe places to play in communities of color.社区营造健康环境:改善有色人种社区获取健康食品的机会以及安全的玩耍场所。
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69 Suppl 1:S117-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.026. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation characteristics that may promote sustainability of a rural physical activity initiative: examination of Play Streets through the lens of community implementers.可能促进农村体育活动倡议可持续性的实施特征:从社区实施者的角度审视“游戏街道”。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 May 2;5(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00571-2.
2
Addressing the Spectrum of Opioid Misuse Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery in Rural Washington State Communities: Provider Identified Barriers and Needs.应对华盛顿州农村社区阿片类药物滥用预防、治疗和康复的各个方面:提供者确定的障碍和需求。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Apr;60(3):600-607. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01215-w. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Assessing the built environment, programs, and policies that support physical activity opportunities in the rural Deep South.评估美国最南部农村地区支持体育活动机会的建筑环境、项目和政策。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Apr 28;33:102223. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102223. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Design of the Equity in Prevention and Progression of Hypertension by Addressing Barriers to Nutrition and Physical Activity Study: A Cluster Randomized Trial.通过解决营养和身体活动障碍预防和减缓高血压的公平性研究设计:一项群组随机试验。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Apr 15;36(5):248-255. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad011.
5
Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.促进多部门协作以在农村社区实施癌症控制干预措施:一项描述性定性研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Aug 11;19:E48. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210450.
6
Exploring Extension Agent Capacity and Readiness to Adopt Policy, Systems and Environmental Change Approaches.探索推广代理人的能力和准备情况,以采用政策、系统和环境变化方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 26;10:856788. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856788. eCollection 2022.
7
What Sets Physically Active Rural Communities Apart from Less Active Ones? A Comparative Case Study of Three US Counties.是什么让身体活跃的农村社区有别于不那么活跃的社区?对三个美国县的比较案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 9;18(20):10574. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010574.
8
The High Obesity Program: A Collaboration Between Public Health and Cooperative Extension Services to Address Obesity.高肥胖项目:公共卫生与合作推广服务机构应对肥胖问题的合作
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Mar 19;17:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190283.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014.2005年至2014年美国成年人肥胖趋势
JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2284-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6458.
2
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2011-2014.2011 - 2014年美国成年人及青少年肥胖症患病率
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Nov(219):1-8.
3
Effects of the built environment on physical activity of adults living in rural settings.居住在农村环境中的成年人的身体活动受建成环境的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(4):267-83. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.08040532.
4
Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity.建筑环境中的不平等是导致身体活动和肥胖方面关键健康差异的根本原因。
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):417-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0058.
5
Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care.界定文化能力:解决健康及医疗保健领域种族/族裔差异问题的实用框架。
Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):293-302. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.293.