• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年初级保健患者对电子通信方式的偏好:横断面调查

Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey.

作者信息

Fridman Ilona, Smalls Ahmaya, Fleming Patrice, Elston Lafata Jennifer

机构信息

Cancer Care Quality Program, Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 24;7:e40709. doi: 10.2196/40709.

DOI:10.2196/40709
PMID:37223979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10248769/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health information delivered via daily modes of communication such as email, text, or telephone reportedly supports improved health behavior and outcomes. While different modes of communication beyond clinical visits have proven successful for patient outcomes, preferences for communication modes have not been comprehensively studied among older primary care patients. We addressed this gap by assessing patient preferences for receiving cancer screening and other information from their doctors' offices.

OBJECTIVE

We explored stated preferences by communication modes through the lens of social determinants of health (SDOH) to gauge acceptability and equity implications for future interventions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was mailed to primary care patients aged 45-75 years, in 2020-2021, which assessed respondents' use of telephones, computers, or tablets in daily life and their preferred modes of communication for different types of health information, including educational materials about cancer screening, tips for taking prescription medication, and protection from respiratory diseases from their doctors' offices. Respondents indicated their willingness to receive messages from their doctors' offices via each of the provided modes of communication, including telephone, text, email, patient portals, websites, and social media, on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "unwilling" to "willing." We present the percentage of respondents who indicated that they were "willing" to receive information via specific electronic mode. Chi-square tests were used to compare participants' willingness by social characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 133 people completed the survey (response rate 27%). The average respondent age was 64 years, 82 (63%) respondents were female, 106 (83%) were White, 20 (16%) were Black, and 1 (1%) was Asian. In total, 75 (58%) respondents had a bachelor's degree or higher; 26 (20%) resided in rural areas, 37 (29%) in suburban areas, 50 (39%) in a town, and 15 (12%) in a city. The majority, 73 (57%), reported being comfortable with their income. Preferences of respondents for electronic communication about cancer screening were distributed as follows: 100 (75%) respondents were willing to receive information from their doctor's office via their patient portal, 98 (74%) via email, 75 (56%) via text, 60 (45%) via the hospital website, 50 (38%) via telephone, and 14 (11%) via social media. About 6 (5%) respondents were unwilling to receive any communication via electronic modes. Preferences were distributed similarly for other types of information. Respondents reporting lesser income and education consistently preferred receiving telephone calls relative to other communication modes.

CONCLUSIONS

To optimize health communication and reach a socioeconomically diverse population, telephone calls should be added to electronic communication, especially for people with less income and education. Further research needs to identify the underlying reasons for the observed differences and how best to ensure that socioeconomically diverse groups of older adults can access reliable health information and health care services.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/d6d32a78d18f/formative_v7i1e40709_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/eed58b92138a/formative_v7i1e40709_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/473534b0f946/formative_v7i1e40709_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/0b5d58d7b201/formative_v7i1e40709_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/54de3cab73a8/formative_v7i1e40709_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/f1f9fe320ec9/formative_v7i1e40709_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/dd445aac9abe/formative_v7i1e40709_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/ef1fdbaaa8e4/formative_v7i1e40709_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/d6d32a78d18f/formative_v7i1e40709_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/eed58b92138a/formative_v7i1e40709_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/473534b0f946/formative_v7i1e40709_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/0b5d58d7b201/formative_v7i1e40709_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/54de3cab73a8/formative_v7i1e40709_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/f1f9fe320ec9/formative_v7i1e40709_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/dd445aac9abe/formative_v7i1e40709_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/ef1fdbaaa8e4/formative_v7i1e40709_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2880/10248769/d6d32a78d18f/formative_v7i1e40709_fig8.jpg
摘要

背景

据报道,通过电子邮件、短信或电话等日常通信方式传递的健康信息有助于改善健康行为和健康结果。虽然临床就诊以外的不同通信方式已被证明对患者治疗效果有积极作用,但对于老年初级保健患者对通信方式的偏好尚未进行全面研究。我们通过评估患者对从医生办公室接收癌症筛查及其他信息的偏好来填补这一空白。

目的

我们从健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)角度探讨了不同通信方式下的既定偏好,以评估未来干预措施的可接受性和平等性影响。

方法

2020年至2021年,我们向45 - 75岁的初级保健患者邮寄了一份横断面调查问卷,该问卷评估了受访者在日常生活中对电话、电脑或平板电脑的使用情况,以及他们对于不同类型健康信息(包括癌症筛查教育材料、处方药服用小贴士以及来自医生办公室的呼吸道疾病防护信息)的首选通信方式。受访者通过从“不愿意”到“愿意”的5点李克特量表,表明他们愿意通过提供的每种通信方式(包括电话、短信、电子邮件、患者门户网站、网站和社交媒体)接收医生办公室的信息。我们给出了表示“愿意”通过特定电子方式接收信息的受访者百分比。使用卡方检验按社会特征比较参与者的意愿。

结果

共有133人完成了调查(回复率27%)。受访者的平均年龄为64岁,82名(63%)受访者为女性,106名(83%)为白人,20名(16%)为黑人,1名(1%)为亚洲人。共有75名(58%)受访者拥有学士学位或更高学历;26名(20%)居住在农村地区,37名(29%)居住在郊区,50名(39%)居住在城镇,15名(12%)居住在城市。大多数人,即73名(57%),表示对自己的收入感到满意。受访者对癌症筛查电子通信的偏好分布如下:100名(75%)受访者愿意通过患者门户网站接收医生办公室的信息,98名(74%)愿意通过电子邮件接收,75名(56%)愿意通过短信接收,60名(45%)愿意通过医院网站接收,50名(38%)愿意通过电话接收,14名(11%)愿意通过社交媒体接收。约6名(5%)受访者不愿意通过电子方式接收任何通信。对于其他类型的信息,偏好分布类似。报告收入和教育水平较低的受访者相对于其他通信方式,一直更倾向于接收电话。

结论

为了优化健康通信并覆盖社会经济背景多样的人群,应在电子通信之外增加电话通信方式,特别是对于收入和教育水平较低的人群。进一步的研究需要确定观察到的差异的潜在原因,以及如何最好地确保社会经济背景多样的老年人群体能够获取可靠的健康信息和医疗服务。

相似文献

1
Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey.老年初级保健患者对电子通信方式的偏好:横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 24;7:e40709. doi: 10.2196/40709.
2
Differences in Mode Preferences, Response Rates, and Mode Effect Between Automated Email and Phone Survey Systems for Patients of Primary Care Practices: Cross-Sectional Study.在初级保健实践患者中,自动化电子邮件和电话调查系统的模式偏好、响应率和模式效果差异:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e21240. doi: 10.2196/21240.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.健康研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan.基于种族、族裔和年龄的患者门户网站及其他电子健康技术的使用机会和偏好差异:一项针对大型健康计划中老年人的数据库及调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 4;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105.
6
Use of Telephone and Digital Channels to Engage Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults in Health Disparities Research Within a Social Service Setting: Cross-Sectional Study.在社会服务环境中利用电话和数字渠道促使社会经济弱势成年人参与健康差异研究:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):e16680. doi: 10.2196/16680.
7
8
Gap in Willingness and Access to Video Visit Use Among Older High-risk Veterans: Cross-sectional Study.高龄高危退伍军人在使用视频访问方面的意愿和机会之间存在差距:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 8;24(4):e32570. doi: 10.2196/32570.
9
Tailored Web-Based Information for Younger and Older Patients with Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Preparatory Educational Intervention on Patient Outcomes.为年轻和老年癌症患者量身定制的基于网络的信息:一项关于患者结局的预备性教育干预的随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 1;21(10):e14407. doi: 10.2196/14407.
10
Patient Preferences for Test Result Notification.患者对检查结果通知的偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1651-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3344-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Electronic Health Services on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.电子健康服务对初级保健中患者满意度的影响:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2025 May 12;17(5):e83949. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83949. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Women's preferences for testing to predict breast cancer risk - a discrete choice experiment.女性对预测乳腺癌风险检测的偏好——一项离散选择实验
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 21;23(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06119-9.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of age and digital competence on the use of online health and social care services: A cross-sectional population-based survey.年龄和数字能力对在线健康与社会护理服务使用的影响:一项基于人群的横断面调查。
Digit Health. 2022 Jan 28;8:20552076221074485. doi: 10.1177/20552076221074485. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Digitally Disconnected: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Digital Divide and Potential Solutions.数字鸿沟:关于患者对数字鸿沟及潜在解决方案看法的定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Dec 15;8(4):e33364. doi: 10.2196/33364.
3
Evaluating the Utility of Using Text Messages to Communicate With Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
评估在新冠疫情期间使用短信与患者沟通的效用。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Jun 15;5(6):e21.00042. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00042.
4
Patient preferences for using technology in communication about symptoms post hospital discharge.患者出院后在症状交流中使用技术的偏好。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06119-7.
5
Improving secure messaging: A framework for support, partnership & information-giving communicating electronically (SPICE).改善安全消息传递:一个支持、合作和电子信息交流的框架(SPICE)。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1380-1386. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
6
Digital Divide in Perceived Benefits of Online Health Care and Social Welfare Services: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study.数字鸿沟对在线医疗保健和社会福利服务感知益处的影响:全国横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17616. doi: 10.2196/17616.
7
Sociodemographic Representativeness in a Nationwide Web-Based Survey of the View of Men on Involvement in Health Care Decision-Making: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.一项关于男性参与医疗保健决策观点的全国性网络调查的社会人口统计学代表性:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 2;22(9):e19517. doi: 10.2196/19517.
8
Communication Behavior Changes Between Patients With Diabetes and Healthcare Providers Over 9 Years: Retrospective Cohort Study.9 年间糖尿病患者与医护人员间的沟通行为变化:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e17186. doi: 10.2196/17186.
9
Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review.《全民研究计划的多样性和包容性:范围综述》。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0234962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234962. eCollection 2020.
10
Revisiting Effective Communication Between Patients and Physicians: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Comparing Text-Based Electronic Versus Face-to-Face Communication.重新审视患者与医生之间的有效沟通:比较基于文本的电子沟通与面对面沟通的横断面问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 13;22(5):e16965. doi: 10.2196/16965.