Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada.
Chemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2023 Jun 13;19(11):3184-3193. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00218. Epub 2023 May 24.
The variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) remains one of the most popular near-term quantum algorithms for solving the electronic structure problem. Yet, for its practicality, the main challenge to overcome is improving the quantum measurement efficiency. Numerous quantum measurement techniques have been developed recently, but it is unclear how these state-of-the-art measurement techniques will perform in extensions of VQE for obtaining excited electronic states. Assessing the measurement techniques' performance in the excited state VQE is crucial because the measurement requirements in these extensions are typically much greater than in the ground state VQE, as one must measure the expectation value of multiple observables in addition to that of the electronic Hamiltonian. Here, we adapt various measurement techniques to two widely used excited state VQE algorithms: multistate contraction and quantum subspace expansion. Then, the measurement requirements of each measurement technique are numerically compared. We find that the best methods for multistate contraction are ones utilizing Hamiltonian data and wave function information to minimize the number of measurements. In contrast, randomized measurement techniques are more appropriate for quantum subspace expansion, with many more observables of vastly different energy scales to measure. Nevertheless, when the best possible measurement technique for each excited state VQE algorithm is considered, significantly fewer measurements are required in multistate contraction than in quantum subspace expansion.
变分量子本征求解器(VQE)仍然是解决电子结构问题的最受欢迎的近期量子算法之一。然而,为了其实用性,需要克服的主要挑战是提高量子测量效率。最近已经开发出了许多量子测量技术,但不清楚这些最先进的测量技术在 VQE 的扩展中用于获得激发电子态时的表现如何。评估测量技术在激发态 VQE 中的性能至关重要,因为这些扩展中的测量要求通常比在基态 VQE 中要大得多,因为除了电子哈密顿量之外,还必须测量多个可观测量的期望值。在这里,我们将各种测量技术应用于两种广泛使用的激发态 VQE 算法:多态收缩和量子子空间扩展。然后,数值比较了每种测量技术的测量要求。我们发现,对于多态收缩,最好的方法是利用哈密顿量数据和波函数信息来最小化测量次数。相比之下,随机测量技术更适合量子子空间扩展,因为需要测量的可观测量具有非常不同的能量尺度。然而,当考虑每个激发态 VQE 算法的最佳可能测量技术时,多态收缩所需的测量次数明显少于量子子空间扩展。