Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Department of Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
J Pain. 2023 Oct;24(10):1830-1842. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 May 22.
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unexpected changes in the healthcare system. This current longitudinal study had 2 aims: 1) describe the trajectory of pandemic-associated stressors and patient-reported health outcomes among patients receiving treatment at a tertiary pain clinic over 2 years (May 2020 to June 2022); and 2) identify vulnerable subgroups. We assessed changes in pandemic-associated stressors and patient-reported health outcome measures. The study sample included 1270 adult patients who were predominantly female (74.6%), White (66.2%), non-Hispanic (80.6%), married (66.1%), not on disability (71.2%), college-educated (59.45%), and not currently working (57.9%). We conducted linear mixed effect modeling to examine the main effect of time with controlling for a random intercept. Findings revealed a significant main effect of time for all pandemic-associated stressors except financial impact. Over time, patients reported increased proximity to COVID-19, but decreased pandemic-associated stressors. A significant improvement was also observed in pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and PROMIS-pain interference, sleep, anxiety, anger, and depression scores. Demographic-based subgroup analyses for pandemic-associated stressors revealed that younger adults, Hispanics, Asians, and patients receiving disability compensation were vulnerable groups either during the initial visit or follow-up visits. We observed additional differential pandemic effects between groups based on participant sex, education level, and working status. In conclusion, despite unanticipated changes in pain care services during the pandemic, patients receiving pain treatments adjusted to pandemic-related stressors and improved their health status over time. As the current study observed differential pandemic impacts on patient subgroups, future studies should investigate and address the unmet needs of vulnerable subgroups. PERSPECTIVE: Over a 2-year timeframe, the pandemic did not adversely influence physical and mental health among treatment-seeking patients with chronic pain. Patients reported small but significant improvements across indices of physical and psychosocial health. Differential impacts emerged among groups based on ethnicity, age, disability status, gender, education level, and working status.
新冠疫情促使医疗系统发生了意料之外的变化。本纵向研究有两个目的:1)描述在一家三级疼痛诊所接受治疗的患者在 2 年期间(2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 6 月)与大流行相关的应激源和患者报告的健康结果的轨迹;2)确定弱势群体。我们评估了与大流行相关的应激源和患者报告的健康结果测量指标的变化。研究样本包括 1270 名成年患者,他们主要为女性(74.6%)、白人(66.2%)、非西班牙裔(80.6%)、已婚(66.1%)、未残疾(71.2%)、受过大学教育(59.45%)和当前未工作(57.9%)。我们进行了线性混合效应模型分析,以检查时间的主要影响,并控制随机截距。研究结果显示,除财务影响外,所有与大流行相关的应激源均存在显著的时间主效应。随着时间的推移,患者报告与 COVID-19 的距离越来越近,但与大流行相关的应激源却减少了。疼痛强度、疼痛灾难化、PROMIS 疼痛干扰、睡眠、焦虑、愤怒和抑郁评分也显著改善。基于人口统计学的与大流行相关的应激源亚组分析显示,年轻成年人、西班牙裔、亚洲人和领取残疾津贴的患者在初次就诊或随访时都是弱势群体。我们还观察到,根据参与者的性别、教育水平和工作状态,不同群体之间存在与大流行相关的不同影响。总之,尽管大流行期间疼痛护理服务发生了意外变化,但接受疼痛治疗的患者适应了与大流行相关的应激源,并随着时间的推移改善了他们的健康状况。由于本研究观察到大流行对患者亚组的不同影响,未来的研究应该调查和解决弱势群体的未满足需求。观点:在 2 年的时间内,大流行并没有对寻求治疗的慢性疼痛患者的身心健康产生不利影响。患者报告在身体和心理社会健康指标方面有较小但显著的改善。基于种族、年龄、残疾状况、性别、教育水平和工作状况,不同群体之间出现了不同的影响。