Jacobs T J
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1986;34(2):289-307. doi: 10.1177/000306518603400203.
This communication focuses on the relation of countertransference to psychoanalytic technique, calling attention not to the more obvious forms of countertransference that have been commented on by previous writers on the subject, but to its subtler ones. Often well camouflaged within the framework of traditional, time-tested techniques, this aspect of countertransference may attach itself to our way of listening and thinking about patients, to our efforts at interpretation, to the process of working through, or to the complex issue of termination. Less recognizable than its more boisterous counterpart and in some respects less tangible, this side of the problem of countertransference is no less important. For it is precisely those subtle, often scarcely visible countertransference reactions, so easily rationalized as parts of our standard operating procedures and so easily overlooked, that may in the end have the greatest impact on our analytic work.
本文着重探讨反移情与精神分析技术的关系，并非关注以往该主题作者所论述的较为明显的反移情形式，而是其更为微妙的形式。反移情的这一方面常常巧妙地隐匿于传统且久经考验的技术框架之中，它可能附着于我们倾听和思考患者的方式、我们的解释努力、修通的过程，或者终止治疗这一复杂问题上。与更为明显的反移情相比，它较难识别，在某些方面也较难捉摸，但反移情问题的这一面同样重要。因为恰恰是那些微妙的、常常几乎难以察觉的反移情反应，很容易被合理化地当作我们标准操作程序的一部分而被轻易忽视，然而最终它们可能对我们的分析工作产生最大的影响。
