Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Discipline of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Jul;164(1):e14-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.04.011. Epub 2023 May 23.
This study aimed to identify a simple yet reliable soft-tissue parameter for the clinical determination of esthetic lip position by investigating the most consistent reference lines and assessing their sensitivity and specificity.
A total of 5745 records from Chinese patients aged >18 years were screened. In part I of the study, lateral view photographs of 96 subjects (33 males, 63 females) with esthetic facial profiles were selected. The profile esthetics of each photograph was first scored by 52 dental students, followed by 97 laypeople on a 5-point attractiveness scale. For the top 25% of photographs with the highest score for each sex (8 males, 16 females), the consistency of 6 commonly used reference lines were assessed to determine the esthetic lip position. In part II of the study, lip positions relative to Steiner's (S) and Ricketts' (E) lines in the profile photographs of 86 patients (43 males, 43 females) deemed to have an esthetically unpleasing profile were compared with those in 86 Chinese movie star idols (43 males, 43 females).
In part I of the study, the S, E, and Burstone's (B) lines exhibited the lowest standard deviations for the upper and lower lips. B line was excluded from further analysis because of its higher mean absolute values, and S and E lines were used for the subjective assessment in part II of the study. In part II, the S line showed a sensitivity of 86.0% and 86.0% and a specificity of 81.4% and 83.7% for males and females, respectively. In contrast, the E line presented a sensitivity of 88.4% and 93.0% and a specificity of 79.1% and 74.4% for males and females, respectively.
S, E, and B lines were the most consistent soft-tissue parameters among both sexes; however, because of the smaller absolute values, the S line would be more convenient among the 3 for a quick clinical assessment of lip position. Moreover, the performance of both S and E lines was similar among both sexes, which supports using these lines in assessing the esthetic lip position.
本研究旨在通过调查最一致的参考线并评估其敏感性和特异性,确定一种简单而可靠的软组织参数,用于临床确定美容唇位。
筛选了 5745 例年龄大于 18 岁的中国患者的记录。在研究的第一部分,选择了 96 名(33 名男性,63 名女性)具有美容面部轮廓的受试者的侧位照片。每位受试者的照片的轮廓美观度首先由 52 名牙科学生进行评分,然后由 97 名非专业人士在 5 分吸引力量表上进行评分。对于每性别得分最高的前 25%的照片(8 名男性,16 名女性),评估 6 条常用参考线的一致性,以确定美容唇位。在研究的第二部分,比较了 86 名(43 名男性,43 名女性)被认为具有不美观轮廓的患者的轮廓照片中唇相对于 Steiner(S)和 Ricketts(E)线的位置与 86 名中国电影明星偶像(43 名男性,43 名女性)的位置。
在研究的第一部分,上唇和下唇的 S、E 和 Burstone(B)线的标准偏差最低。由于平均绝对值较高,B 线被排除在进一步分析之外,并且 S 和 E 线用于研究的第二部分的主观评估。在第二部分中,S 线对男性和女性的敏感性分别为 86.0%和 86.0%,特异性分别为 81.4%和 83.7%。相比之下,E 线对男性和女性的敏感性分别为 88.4%和 93.0%,特异性分别为 79.1%和 74.4%。
S、E 和 B 线是两性中最一致的软组织参数;然而,由于绝对值较小,因此在 3 条线中,S 线在快速临床评估唇位方面更方便。此外,S 线和 E 线在两性中的表现相似,这支持在评估美容唇位时使用这些线。