Diamond A M
J Gerontol. 1986 Jul;41(4):520-5. doi: 10.1093/geronj/41.4.520.
Declining research productivity with age is implied by economic models of life-cycle human capital investment but is denied by some recent empirical studies. The purpose of the present study is to provide new evidence on whether a scientist's output generally declines with advancing age. A longitudinal data set has been compiled for scientists and mathematicians at six major departments, including data on age, salaries, annual citations (stock of human capital), citations to current output (flow of human capital), and quantity of current output measured both in number of articles and in number of pages. Analysis of the data indicates that salaries peak from the early to mid-60s, whereas annual citations appear to peak from age 39 to 89 for different departments with a mean age of 59 for the 6 departments. The quantity and quality of current research output appear to decline continuously with age.
生命周期人力资本投资的经济模型暗示科研生产力会随着年龄增长而下降,但一些近期的实证研究对此予以否认。本研究的目的是提供新的证据,以证明科学家的产出是否通常会随着年龄的增长而下降。我们为六个主要部门的科学家和数学家编制了一个纵向数据集,其中包括年龄、薪资、年度引用次数(人力资本存量)、对当前产出的引用(人力资本流量)以及以文章数量和页数衡量的当前产出数量等数据。数据分析表明,薪资在60岁出头到60多岁中期达到峰值,而不同部门的年度引用次数似乎在39岁至89岁达到峰值,这六个部门的平均年龄为59岁。当前研究产出的数量和质量似乎会随着年龄的增长而持续下降。