Suppr超能文献

肌肉减少症定义和结局联盟 2020 年定义:肌肉减少症与加拿大老龄化纵向研究中残疾的关联和判别准确性。

Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium 2020 Definition: Association and Discriminatory Accuracy of Sarcopenia With Disability in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Aug 27;78(9):1597-1603. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad131.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous sarcopenia definitions have poor discriminatory accuracy for identifying people with/without relevant health outcomes, and poor agreement between methods of operationalizing sarcopenia criterion. The 2020 Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) definition recommends grip strength (absolute, or standardized to body mass index, total body fat, lean arm mass, or weight), and gait speed. The agreement between methods of operationalizing grip strength and discriminatory accuracy of the SDOC definition for health outcomes such as activities of daily living (ADL) disability is unknown.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analyses of 27 924 Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging participants aged 45-85 at baseline (2012-2015) stratified by sex. The associations of the SDOC definitions with ADL disability were assessed using logistic regression. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses were conducted to assess discriminatory accuracy. Agreement between methods of operationalizing grip strength was measured using Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia was associated with 1.60 (1.42-1.80) to 5.80 (4.89-6.88) greater odds of ADL disability with AUC values between 0.60 and 0.81. Agreement between methods of operationalizing grip strength was between 0.10-0.80 for grip strength alone and 0.45-0.91 when combined with gait speed.

CONCLUSIONS

The SDOC-suggested criteria of grip strength and gait speed are significantly associated with ADL disability and have high discriminatory accuracy. However, the agreement between methods of operationalizing grip strength tended to be modest, and AUC, sensitivity, and specificity differed depending on the definition. We suggest a single measure of grip strength be considered and age-stratified cutoff values to improve AUC values.

摘要

背景

以前的肌少症定义在识别具有/不具有相关健康结果的人群方面准确性较差,并且在操作肌少症标准的方法之间一致性较差。2020 年肌少症定义和结果联合会(SDOC)建议使用握力(绝对值,或按体重指数、总体脂肪量、瘦臂质量或体重标准化)和步态速度来定义肌少症。目前尚不清楚用于操作握力的方法之间的一致性以及 SDOC 定义对日常生活活动(ADL)残疾等健康结果的区分准确性。

方法

对基线时(2012-2015 年)年龄在 45-85 岁的 27924 名加拿大纵向老龄化研究参与者进行横断面分析,按性别分层。使用逻辑回归评估 SDOC 定义与 ADL 残疾的关联。进行曲线下面积(AUC)分析以评估区分准确性。使用 Cohen's kappa 评估操作握力的方法之间的一致性。

结果

肌少症与 ADL 残疾的比值比(OR)为 1.60(1.42-1.80)至 5.80(4.89-6.88),AUC 值在 0.60 至 0.81 之间。操作握力的方法之间的一致性在握力单独使用时为 0.10-0.80,与步态速度结合使用时为 0.45-0.91。

结论

SDOC 建议的握力和步态速度标准与 ADL 残疾显著相关,且具有较高的区分准确性。然而,操作握力的方法之间的一致性往往适中,AUC、灵敏度和特异性取决于定义。我们建议考虑单一的握力测量,并使用年龄分层的截断值来提高 AUC 值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验