School of Economics and Trade, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
The Water Economy and Water Rights Research Center, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0279220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279220. eCollection 2023.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) has become a buzzword in investment circles as ecological damage and climate warming occur. ESG assessment is one of the important institutions of the green financial system, which plays a significant part in boosting corporate green development. We use the number of green patent applications and green patent citations to measure corporate green innovation and analyze the micro-green effects of the ESG score system using the panel fixed effects models, which means that we explore the impact of the ESG scores on corporate green innovation performance, the specific mechanism of this effect, and the asymmetry of this impact under different moderation effects by using Chinese listed A-shares in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010-2019 as our research sample. We find that ESG positively affects corporate green innovation; the higher the ESG evaluation, the more it improves firms' green innovation performance. The promotion effect is reflected quantitatively and qualitatively and remains valid after several robustness tests. In addition, the contribution of ESG to corporate green innovation is achieved through two main paths improving corporate investment efficiency and government-enterprise relations. Corporate black attributes inhibit the contribution of ESG to green innovation, while green attributes strengthen the contribution of ESG to green innovation performance. Our study demonstrates the importance of corporate participation in environmental, social, and governance practices for corporate green innovation, which is beneficial for achieving win-win environmental, social, and economic results. Furthermore, our research completes the research on the effects of corporate green performance and green finance. It can provide empirical references for promoting corporate green development and improving the ESG evaluation system.
环境、社会和治理(ESG)在生态破坏和气候变暖发生后成为投资界的热门词汇。ESG 评估是绿色金融体系的重要机构之一,在促进企业绿色发展方面发挥着重要作用。我们使用绿色专利申请和绿色专利引用数量来衡量企业的绿色创新,并使用面板固定效应模型分析 ESG 评分体系的微观绿色效应,这意味着我们通过使用 2010-2019 年中国上海和深圳的 A 股上市公司作为研究样本,探讨 ESG 分数对企业绿色创新绩效的影响、这种影响的具体机制以及在不同调节效应下的影响不对称性。我们发现 ESG 对企业绿色创新有积极影响;ESG 评价越高,企业绿色创新绩效提高越多。这种促进作用在定量和定性上都得到了体现,并且经过多次稳健性检验仍然有效。此外,ESG 对企业绿色创新的贡献是通过提高企业投资效率和政企关系这两个主要途径实现的。企业的黑色属性抑制了 ESG 对绿色创新的贡献,而绿色属性则加强了 ESG 对绿色创新绩效的贡献。我们的研究表明,企业参与环境、社会和治理实践对企业绿色创新的重要性,这有利于实现环境、社会和经济的双赢结果。此外,我们的研究完成了对企业绿色绩效和绿色金融影响的研究。它可以为促进企业绿色发展和完善 ESG 评价体系提供实证参考。