• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会决定因素对门诊医疗敏感条件的影响:基于患者视角的定性元分析。

Social determinants of ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a qualitative meta-synthesis based on patient perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 May 9;11:1147732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147732. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147732
PMID:37228726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10203230/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC) are preventable but cost billions in modern countries. The objective of the study is to use a meta-synthesis approach based on patients' narratives from qualitative studies to reveal why individuals are at risk of ACSC hospitalizations or ED visits.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were utilized to identify qualified qualitative studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis were used for reporting the review. The thematic synthesis was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Among 324 qualified studies, nine qualitative studies comprising 167 unique individual patients were selected based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Through the meta-synthesis, we identified the core theme, four major themes, and the corresponding subthemes. Poor disease management, the core theme, turns individuals at risk of ACSC hospitalizations or ED visits. The four major themes contribute to poor disease management, including difficulties in approaching health services, non-compliance with medications, difficulties in managing the disease at home, and poor relationships with providers. Each major theme comprised 2-4 subthemes. The most cited subthemes are relative to upstream social determinants, such as financial constraints, inaccessible health care, low health literacy, psychosocial or cognitive constraints.

CONCLUSION

Without addressing upstream social determinants, socially vulnerable patients are unlikely to manage their disease well at home even though they know how to do it and are willing to do it.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

National Library of Medicine, with ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05456906. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05456906.

摘要

背景

在现代国家,由于可预防的门诊医疗敏感条件(ACSC)而导致的住院或急诊就诊会耗费数十亿美元。本研究的目的是使用基于定性研究中患者叙述的元综合方法来揭示为什么个体存在 ACSC 住院或急诊就诊的风险。

方法

利用 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库来确定合格的定性研究。采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目来报告综述。采用主题综合分析来分析数据。

结果

在 324 项合格研究中,根据纳入/排除标准,选择了九项定性研究,其中包括 167 名独特的个体患者。通过元综合,我们确定了核心主题、四个主要主题和相应的子主题。较差的疾病管理是个体存在 ACSC 住院或急诊就诊风险的核心主题。四个主要主题有助于较差的疾病管理,包括难以接近卫生服务、不遵守药物治疗、在家中管理疾病困难以及与提供者的关系不佳。每个主要主题包含 2-4 个子主题。引用最多的子主题与上游社会决定因素有关,如经济限制、医疗保健不可及、健康素养低、心理社会或认知限制。

结论

如果不解决上游社会决定因素,即使患者知道如何做并且愿意做,他们也不太可能在家中很好地管理自己的疾病,因为他们处于社会弱势地位。

试验注册

美国国立医学图书馆,ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05456906。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05456906。

相似文献

1
Social determinants of ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a qualitative meta-synthesis based on patient perspectives.社会决定因素对门诊医疗敏感条件的影响:基于患者视角的定性元分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 9;11:1147732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147732. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Meta-Synthesis on Migraine Management.偏头痛管理的元综合。
Headache. 2018 Jan;58(1):22-44. doi: 10.1111/head.13212. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Disparities in potentially avoidable emergency department (ED) care: ED visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.可避免的急诊医疗服务(ED)利用差异:对可在门诊治疗的条件的急诊就诊。
Med Care. 2012 Dec;50(12):1020-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270bad4.
7
Social Risk Interventions and Health Care Utilization for Pediatric Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.社会风险干预对儿童哮喘的医疗利用影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Feb 1;176(2):e215103. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5103. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
'They do not care how much you know until they know how much you care': a qualitative meta-synthesis of patient experience in the emergency department.“他们不在乎你知道多少,直到他们知道你有多关心”:对急诊科患者体验的定性元分析。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jun;36(6):355-363. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208156. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
9
Patients' Perspectives on Determinants Avoidable Hospitalizations: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire.患者对可避免住院因素的看法:问卷的制定和验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 7;19(5):3138. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053138.
10
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的心力衰竭专科管理:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural Transformation of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems' Guidelines Needed to Effectively Measure Well-Being.需要对《国际疾病分类与相关健康问题统计分类》指南进行文化转变,以有效衡量幸福感。
Med Care. 2024 Dec 1;62(12 Suppl 1):S30-S33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002049. Epub 2024 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural Patients' Perceptions of Their Potentially Preventable Hospitalisation: A Qualitative Study.农村患者对其潜在可预防住院情况的认知:一项定性研究。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jan 4;9:23743735211069825. doi: 10.1177/23743735211069825. eCollection 2022.
2
How do people understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.人们如何理解过度检测和过度诊断?定性研究的系统评价和元综合。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Sep;285:114255. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114255. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
3
Diabetic ketoacidosis presentations in a low socio-economic area: are services suitable?
低社会经济地区的糖尿病酮症酸中毒表现:服务是否合适?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 10;21(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06715-7.
4
Qualitative analysis of reasons for hospitalization for severe hypoglycemia among older adults with diabetes.老年糖尿病患者严重低血糖住院原因的定性分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 17;21(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02268-w.
5
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
6
Older adult visits to the emergency department for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.老年人因门诊护理敏感疾病前往急诊科就诊。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jun 30;1(5):824-828. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12164. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
Financial Performance of Hospitals in the Appalachian Region Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program.阿巴拉契亚地区医院在医院再入院率降低计划和医院价值导向型采购计划下的财务表现。
J Rural Health. 2021 Mar;37(2):296-307. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12475. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
What Words Convey: The Potential for Patient Narratives to Inform Quality Improvement.文字传达:患者叙事对质量改进的启示潜力。
Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):176-227. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12374.
9
Ambulatory care sensitive chronic conditions: what can we learn from patients about the role of primary health care in preventing admissions?门诊护理敏感型慢性病:我们能从患者身上了解到初级卫生保健在预防住院方面的哪些作用?
Aust J Prim Health. 2018 Aug 6. doi: 10.1071/PY17191.
10
A Practical Approach to Screening for Social Determinants of Health.一种筛查健康的社会决定因素的实用方法。
Fam Pract Manag. 2018 May/Jun;25(3):7-12.