Lesser Adriane, Israni Juhi, Lo Alexander X, Ko Kelly J
West Health Institute La Jolla California USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Center for Healthcare Studies Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jun 30;1(5):824-828. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12164. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) represent emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions that might have been avoided through earlier primary care intervention. We characterize the current frequency and cost of ACSCs among older adults (≥65 years of age) in the ED.
This study is a retrospective analysis of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) national claims data distributed by the Research Data Assistance Center, a CMS contractor based at the University of Minnesota. We analyzed outpatient ED-based national claims data for visits made by traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries in 2016. ACSCs were identified according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Prevention Quality Indicators criteria, which require that the ACSC be the primary diagnosis for the visit. Analysis was done in Alteryx and R.
We documented nearly 1.8 million ACSC ED visits in 2016, finding that ≈10.6% of all ED visits by older adult FFS Medicare beneficiaries were associated with an ACSC. ACSC ED visits resulted in admission more often (39.7%) than non-ACSC ED visits (23.9%). Notably, 83% of patients with short-term complications from diabetes were admitted.
ED visits for a primary diagnosis of an ACSC highlight opportunities to improve access to preventive care, particularly earlier recognition and treatment of patients' deteriorating conditions that could have potentially precluded the need for the ED visit. An opportunity exists to leverage ED-based initiatives during an ACSC ED visit to support appropriate community and care transitions of these high-risk patients.
门诊医疗敏感型疾病(ACSCs)指那些通过早期初级保健干预本可避免的急诊就诊和住院情况。我们对老年人(≥65岁)在急诊中ACSCs的当前发生频率和费用进行了特征描述。
本研究是对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的全国索赔数据进行的回顾性分析,这些数据由明尼苏达大学的CMS承包商研究数据协助中心分发。我们分析了2016年传统按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险受益人的基于急诊门诊的全国索赔数据。根据医疗保健研究与质量局的预防质量指标标准确定ACSCs,该标准要求ACSC为就诊的主要诊断。分析在Alteryx和R软件中进行。
我们记录了2016年近180万次ACSC急诊就诊情况,发现老年FFS医疗保险受益人中约10.6%的急诊就诊与ACSC相关。ACSC急诊就诊导致住院的情况比非ACSC急诊就诊更常见(39.7%对23.9%)。值得注意的是,83%患有糖尿病短期并发症的患者被收治入院。
以ACSC作为主要诊断的急诊就诊凸显了改善预防性护理可及性的机会,特别是更早地识别和治疗患者病情恶化情况,这些情况本可避免急诊就诊的需要。在ACSC急诊就诊期间,存在利用基于急诊的举措来支持这些高危患者进行适当的社区和护理过渡的机会。